C.Sakthi, v. the Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged an order quashing his appointment as Noon Meal Organizer. Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner was appointed as an Anganwadi Worker while the petition was pending.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.12.2020
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.25473 OF 2010 & M.P.NOS.1 & 2 OF 2010
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
C.Sakthi .. Petitioner vs 1. The Collector. Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. 2. G.Palaniammal .. Respondents PRAYER:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first Respondent in Na.Ka.No.26040/09/X-1 dated 14.09.2010 and quash the same and direct the first Respondent to appoint the Petitioner as Noon Meal Organizer in the place of the second Respondent with effect from the date of the impugned order.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajendran
For Respondents : Ms.R.J.Radhika, GA for R1 Mr.V.R.Annaganthi for R2
Heard Mr.P.Rajendran, the learned counsel for the Petitioner, Ms.R.J.Radhika, the learned Government Advocate for the first Respondent an Mr.V.R.Annaganthi, the learned counsel for the second Respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C. Sakthi
- respondent
The Collector, Dharmapuri
- respondent
G. Palaniammal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court