Upon final hearing, the Court was informed that the employee respondent in the gratuity dispute had died. Finding nothing survived for adjudication, the Court closed the writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition without imposing costs.
Writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition closed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.03.2020
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
W.P.NO.24277 OF 2003 AND WMP NO.29882 OF 2003
Superintendent of Post Offices
Pattukottai Division
Pattukottai. ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.G.Panneerselvam
2.The Appellate Authority
Under Payment of Gratuity Act
and Regional Labour Commissioner (Central)
Chennai.
3.The Controlling Authority
Under Payment of Gratuity Act
Assistant Labour Commissioner
(Central - II)
Chennai - 600 006. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of
Certiorari, to call for the records in connection with the
order G.A.No.53 of 2001 on the file of the third respondent
dated 10.10.2001 as confirmed in G.A.No.2 of 2002 dated
09.07.2003 on the file of the second respondent and to quash
the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ramesh For Respondent-1: Mr.G.Annamalai For Respondents 2 and 3 : Mr.K.Raju, CGSC
O R D E R
Against the order passed in G.A.No.2 of 2002 dated 09.07.2003 confirming the order of the Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, dated 10.10.2001 in G.A.No.53 of 2001, the petitioner is before this Court.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Superintendent of Post Offices, Pattukottai Division
G.Panneerselvam
M.Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
