This judgment dismisses a writ petition seeking a writ of Mandamus for processing of an objection. The Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel submitted that the parties had settled the matter out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.12.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.24122 of 2016
Veeran ... Petitioner
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to consider and dispose of the petitioner's objection dated 21.04.2016 on merits and in accordance with law within a reasonable time frame as fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Karthik Raja
For Respondents: Ms. A. Madhumathi, Special Government Pleader - R1 Mr. Abdul Saleem, Standing Counsel – R2 & R3 O R D E R
Mr. K.S. Karthik Raja, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the parties had settled the matter
out of Court, hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The District Collector,
Namakkal District,
Collectorate,
Namakkal.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed for issuance of writ of Mandamus survives after the parties have settled the matter out of court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Veeran
The District Collector, Namakkal District
The Superintending Engineer, TNEB/TANTRANSCO
The Junior Engineer, TNEB/TANTRANSCO
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
