4.Heard Mr.P.Paramasiva Doss, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the petitioner Corporation, who would submit that, these employees retained in the service till 2003 and 2004. Well before their retirement, during their services, proceedings were initiated for the purpose of finding out whether there has been any loss sustained by the petitioner Corporation, for which, recovery has to be made from these employees, however, subsequently, on superannuation, these employees were retained even after retirement and that was continued, therefore since the amount have to be recovered as found out by the employer, the employees are not entitled to get the relief of the retirement benefits, as they claimed before the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) by way of computation petition, as referred to above, therefore, since this issue has not been considered by the Labour Court in proper perspective and accordingly, since the impugned orders have been passed erroneously, challenging the same, the present writ petitions have been filed and therefore, the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court against the impugned orders, he contended.
