The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus for measurement of petitioner's land. The court held the petition infructuous and dismissed it.
The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.12.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.21256 of 2017
Mr. V. Chanrasekaran ... Petitioner
v.
1. The District Collector,
Villupuram District.
2. The Tasildhar,
Vikravaandi Taluk,
Villupuram District.
3. The Commissioner,
Block Development Office,
Vikravaandi Taluk,
Villupuram District.
4. The Block Development Officer,
Vikravaandi Taluk,
Villupuram District.
5. The Revenue Inspector,
Vikravaandi Taluk,
Villupuram District.
6. The Surveyor,
Vikravaandi Taluk,
Villupuram District.
7. The Village Administrative Officer,
90, Radhapuram,
91, Seiyyathuvinnam,
Vikravanndi Taluk,
Villupuram District. ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.10.2015 and further direct the 6th respondent to measure the petitioners' house land in appropriate manner situated in Natham
Old Survey No.157, New Survey No.191-2, Seiyyathuvinnaan Village, Radhapuram Post, Vikravaandi Taluk, Villupuam District and restore the petitioners land as if in his Patta.
For Petitioner : Mr. Ambalavanan
For Respondents: Ms. A. Mathumathi,
Special Govt. Pleader
O R D E R
Mr. Ambalavanan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous, hence, the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
W.P.No.21256 of 2017
um[co]
srg 11/01/2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to consider representation on recording rights should be dismissed as infructuous.
V. Chanrasekaran
The District Collector, Villupuram District
The Tasildhar, Vikravaandi Taluk, Villupuram District
The Commissioner, Block Development Office, Vikravaandi Taluk, Villupuram District
The Block Development Officer, Vikravaandi Taluk, Villupuram District
The Revenue Inspector, Vikravaandi Taluk, Villupuram District
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
