Disposed

Hindustan Motor v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC19 Mar 2020WP/20753/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court disposed of writ petitions challenging industrial dispute proceedings. The court noted that the parties had arrived at a settlement and filed a Joint Memorandum of Settlement under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The writ petition was disposed of based on this settlement.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the Joint Memorandum of Settlement filed by the parties. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Hindustan Motor Vs Government of Tamil Nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 19.03.2020

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶4

W.P.No.20753 of 2019

¶5

and W.M.P.Nos.19922, 30499 and 19917 of 2019

¶6

Hindustan Motor Finance Corporation Limited, Chennai Car Thozirchalai Thozilalargal Sangam, Rep.by its General Secretary, Regn.No.167/TVR, No.2/376, Indira Nagar, Keelnallathur, Thiruvallur – 602 002. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Secretary, Labour and Employment, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 3.The Joint Commissioner of Labour, (Conciliation), Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006. 4.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, (Conciliation) Kuralagam, Chennai – 600 108.

¶7

5.Hindustan Motors Finance Corporation Limited, Rep.by its Managing Director, Adhigathur, Kadambathir Post, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Tiruvallur 631 203.

¶8

6.The Management,

¶9

PCA Automobiles India Private Limited, (Peugeot Citroen Automobile), Holiday Inn Hotel, OMR IT World Trade Centre, Expressway, No.110, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chennai 600 041.

¶10

7.The Director, Industrial Safety and Health, 31 A Water Works Road, Thiru vi ka Industrial Estate, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of declaration, declare G.O.Ms.No.15 Industries (MID.1) Department dated 22.02.2018 issued by the 1^st respondent read with the order of the 5^th respondent dated 02.07.2019 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3^rd and 4^th respondent to conciliate on the industrial dispute dated 22.12.2016 read with the petition dated 08.05.2018 raised against both 5^th and 6^th respondents by bringing out a settlement or by submitting a conciliation failure report to the 2^nd respondent and on submission of failure report, direct the 2^nd respondent to refer the dispute for adjudication and to pass such other orders or Directions under Section 10 B of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947.

¶12

(prayer Amended as per order dated 04.02.2020 made in W.M.P.No.28911/2019 in WP.No,20753/2019 by KRCBJ)

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.Balan Haridas

¶14

for Mr.R.Vaigai (Standing Counsel)

¶15

For Respondents: Mr.M.Venkadesh Kumar

¶16

Government Advocate (for RR1 to 4) M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co. (for R5) Mr.Ravi for M/s.Gupta Ravi (for R6)

¶17

The parties are arrived at a settlement and filed Joint Memorandum of Settlements dated 17.03.2020 and 18.03.2020 reached under Section 18 (1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Memorandum of Settlements dated 17.03.2020 and 18.03.2020 are taken on file and shall form part of the order. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The writ petition is disposed of in terms of Joint Memorandum of Settlement. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶19

*Copy of the Memo of Compromise enclosed

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

//True copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar bri To 1.Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Secretary, Labour and Employment, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 3.The Joint Commissioner of Labour, (Conciliation), Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006. 4.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, (Conciliation) Kuralagam, Chennai – 600 108. 5.Hindustan Motors Finance Corporation Limited, Rep.by its Managing Director, Adhigathur, Kadambathir Post, Tiruvallur 631 203. 6.The Management, PCA Automobiles India Private Limited, (Peugeot Citroen Automobile), Holiday Inn Hotel, OMR IT World Trade Centre, Expressway, No.110, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chennai 600 041.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

7.The Director, Industrial Safety and Health, 31 A Water Works Road, Thiru vi ka Industrial Estate, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

¶26

+1cc to Mr.Balan Haridas, Advocate SR.No.24343
+1cc to M/s.Gupta Ravi, Advocate SR.No.24272
+1cc to M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co, Advocate SR.No.24465
+1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.24486
W.P.No.20753 of 2019
and
W.M.P.Nos.19922, 30499
and 19917 of 2019
LN(CO)
GMY(12/06/2020)

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Hindustan Motor v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hindustan Motor v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rev.N.Kaviraj George Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-Ii

T.M.P.Ananthasayanan, Vs The Additional Registrar of Trade Unions and Joint Commissioner of Labour

Radhabai Vs G.Bheeman @ Bheema

M/s.Smart Modern School Vs The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner II

Kasi Mayan Vs The State Information

R.Panneerselvam Vs M/s. Rane Engine Valves Limited