Suresh Kumar v. the Commissioner of Panchayat
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking direction to act on a representation as infructuous, noting the 5th respondent's tenure had ended. No costs awarded.
The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking direction to act on a representation as infructuous, noting the 5th respondent's tenure had ended. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.10.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.19590 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
Suresh Kumar
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Panchayat,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
2.The District Collector,
Salem District.
3.The Assistant Director,
Village Panchayats, Salem.
4.The Block Development Officer,
Pethanaickenpalayam,
Athur Taluk, Salem District.
5.R.Tamilarasi ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to consider and take action on the petitioner's representation dated 24.05.2013 within the time frame as stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Sivakumar
For Respondents: Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari,
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 submitted that the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous for the reason that the tenure of the 5th respondent had come to an end.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel on either side, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS )
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Commissioner of Panchayat,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
2.The District Collector,
Salem District.
3.The Assistant Director,
Village Panchayats, Salem.
4.The Block Development Officer,
Pethanaickenpalayam,
Athur Taluk, Salem District.
+1 cc to Government Pleader,sr.33865.
Ss(co)
krd 28/10
W.P.No.19590 of 2013
and M.P.No.1 of 2013
Suresh Kumar
The Commissioner of Panchayat, Chepauk, Chennai
The District Collector, Salem District
The Assistant Director, Village Panchayats, Salem
The Block Development Officer, Pethanaickenpalayam
R.Tamilarasi
M.Duraismamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court