Dismissed

M/s.Lakshmi Bar (License No. 36 / FL2) v. The Commissioner (Excise)

Madras HC9 Dec 2020WP/17615/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of an excise suspension order. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, who was advised to challenge the suspension within the statutory time frame.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected petitions closed.

M/s.Lakshmi Bar (License No. 36 / FL2) Vs The… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 09.12.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶5

W.P. No.17615 of 2020 and

¶6

WMP. Nos.21846 & 21847 of 2020

¶7

M/s.Lakshmi Bar (License No.36 / FL2)

¶8

Rep by its Partner Tmt.D.Ezhilarasi, D/o.Dharmalingam,

¶9

No.25 and 26, 1^st cross Road, Harbour city Nagar, Melavanjore, T.R.Pattinam, Karaikkal. …Petitioner Vs 1 The Commissioner (Excise), Government of Puducherry Office of the Excise, Commissioner Secretariat, Puducherry-605 001 2 The Deputy Commissioner (Excise, Excise Department, Govt of Puducherry, Karaikkal. …Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 2^nd respondent in his proceedings No. 8012 / DCE / C2 /2020 -21 dated 28.10.2020 quash the same and consequently forebear the respondents from interfering with the FL.2 license no.36 in the name of petitioner.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Vigneshwaran ********* O R D E R

¶12

In the light of memo filed under cover of email dated 09.12.2020 seeking withdrawal of the Writ Petition, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner is always at liberty to challenge the impugned order of suspension as the time frame provided under statute is within 60 days from the

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

date of impugned order and in this matter the same is dated 28.10.2020. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

¶15

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ska
To
1 The Commissioner (Excise),
Government of Puducherry Office of the
Excise, Commissioner Secretariat,
Puducherry-605 001.
2 The Deputy Commissioner (Excise,
Excise Department, Govt of Puducherry,
Karaikkal.
+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 39911
W.P. No.17615 of 2020
and
WMP. Nos.21846 & 21847 of 2020
A.SK(07.01.2021)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Lakshmi Bar (License No. 36 / FL2) v. The Commissioner (Excise)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Lakshmi Bar (License No. 36 / FL2) v. The Commissioner (Excise)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Itc Limited Vs The Principal Commissioner of Customs

Sampath Chettiyar Vs The Commissioner

N.Parameswaran Vs The District Collector

M/s.Powerine Matrix Engineering Private Ltd, Vs The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise

Jain Housing Vs The Principal commissioner of Income Tax-I

Arulmigu Selvaganapathy Vs the Commissioner