Disposed

M/s.Kamban Digital Pvt.Ltd., v. The Secretary

Madras HC9 Jan 2020WP/16919/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ to restrain respondents from interfering in company activities or implementing a digital addressable system in violation of an agency agreement. Court recorded respondents' undertaking not to interfere and directed notice to the petitioner for arrears.

What did the court decide?

Respondents undertaking not to interfere with possession or implement the system; directive to issue notice for arrears of statutory dues if applicable.

M/s.Kamban Digital Pvt.Ltd., Vs The Secretary — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.01.2020

¶2

CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶4

Writ Petition No.16919 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.20130 of 2018

¶5

M/s.Kamban Digital Private Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, S.Senthil Vairavan, S/o.M.S.Selvaraj, No.10, RR Complex, 2^nd Floor, Town Extension KVB Bank Opp., Mayiladuthurai, Tamilnadu 609 001. ...Petitioner

¶6

¶7

1.The Secretary, The Ministry for Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 2, Krishna Menon Marg, New Delhi-110 001.

¶8

2.The District Collector/Nodal Officer, Cable TV, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District.

¶9

3.The Managing Director, Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., 34/123, 6^th Floor, Durga Towers, Marsal Salai, Chennai-600 008.

¶10

4.The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District. ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the 3^rd and 4^th respondents from interfering in day today activities of petitioner's company's namely M/s.Kamban Digital Private Ltd., having office at No.10, RR Complex, 2^nd Floor, town Extension KVB Bank Opp. Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu-609 001 and its sub control room at Sairam complex, No.37/2, Mahathana Street, Mayiladudurai and from implementing Digital Addressable https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ System to their local cable TV operators as per the Agencies

¶12

¶13

agreement dated 19.01.2018 based on the petitioner's representation dated 22.06.2018.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth

¶15

For R1 : Mr.J.Madhanagopal Rao Central Government Standing Counsel For R2 : Mrs. P.Rajalakshmi Additional Government Pleader

¶16

Fro R3 & R4 : Mr.Senthilkumar

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

Mr.Senthilkumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent 3 and 4 made a submission that the respondents 3 and 4 , the Managing Director, Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., and the Special Tahsildar will not directly or indirectly interfere with the possession of the petitioner having office at No.10, RR Complex, 2^nd Floor, Town Extension KVB Bank Opp., Mayildaduturai, Tamilnadu - 609 001 and its Sub Control room at Sairam Complex, No.37/2, Mahathana Street, Mayiladudurai and from implementing Digital Addressable system to their local cable TV operators as per the Agencies agreement dated 19.01.2018.

¶19

The submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 3 and 4 is recorded.

¶20

However, it is stated that if the petitioner has any arrears to be paid with respect to any of the statutory dues, a notice has to be furnished on the petitioner to pay the said arrears.

¶21

With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(J)

¶24

//True Copy//

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

sbn

¶27

¶28

1.The Ministry for Information and Broadcasting, Government of India,

¶29

2, Krishna Menon Marg, New Delhi-110 001.

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

¶32

2.The District Collector/Nodal Officer, Cable TV, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District. 3.The Managing Director, Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., 34/123, 6^th Floor, Durga Towers, Marsal Salai, Chennai-600 008. 4.The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District.

¶33

+1cc to Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao, Advocate SR.2637 +1cc to Mr.S.Gunasekaran, Advocate SR.2311 +1cc to the Government Pleader SR.3248

¶34

Writ Petition No.16919 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.20130 of 2018

¶35

CB(18/02/2020)

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

M/s.Kamban Digital Pvt.Ltd., v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Kamban Digital Pvt.Ltd., v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Shanmugam Pillai, Vs P.Arumugam

G.Santhoshkumar Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Saalai Manikam Vs Union of India

K.Thulasiraman Vs The Assistant Pasport Officer

M/s.S.v.Projects Vs University of Madras

E.Thiruvengadam, Vs The Sub Registrar