Disposed

B.Ramakrishna Reddy v. The Commissioner

Madras HC1 Dec 2020WP/16677/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner sought a mandamus directing the Second Respondent to dispose of a representation within a stipulated time. The Court directed disposal within three weeks after hearing the parties and the Executive Officer, then dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed. Direction given to dispose representation within three weeks after hearing both parties and Executive Officer.

B.Ramakrishna Reddy Vs The Commissioner — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.12.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶5

W.P.No.16677 of 2020

¶6

B.Ramakrishna Reddy
Hereditary Trustee,
Chinna Soragai Village,
Mettur Taluk, Salem District- 636 502. .. Petitioner
Vs
1.The Commissioner,
The Tamilnadu Hindu Religious and Endowment Board,
Kottai Mariyamman Koil Campus, Salem- 636 001.
2.The Joint Commissioner,
The Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Endowment Board,
Kottai Mariyamman Koil Campus, Salem. 636 001
3.The Executive Officer,
Kottai Mariyamman Koil Campus,
Salem 636 001 …Respondents

¶7

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose the representation of the petitioner dated 29.02.2020 and to pass an order on merits within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balaguru Swamy For Respondents : Mr.R.Venkatesh, Government Advocate – R1 & R2

¶9

*********
O R D E R

¶10

The petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the second respondent/Joint Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board to consider and dispose his representation dated 29.02.2020.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

Mr.R.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, who has accepted notice on behalf of the official respondents, i.e., R1 and R2 confirms, on instructions, that the representation has been received and enquiry is on-going.

¶13

Let the same be disposed within a period of three (3) weeks from today after hearing both the petitioner as well as the Executive Officer of Kottai Mariyamman Koil Campus, who is arrayed as R3. Notice has not been issued to R3 in the light of the order passed aforesaid.

¶14

This Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶15

-sd-
Assistant Registrar (CS)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Commissioner,
The Tamilnadu Hindu Religious and Endowment Board,
Kottai Mariyamman Koil Campus, Salem- 636 001.
2.The Joint Commissioner,
The Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Endowment Board,
Kottai Mariyamman Koil Campus, Salem.
3.The Executive Officer,
Kottai Mariyamman Koil Campus, Salem.
+ 1 cc to The Government Pleader SR.NO. 38823
W.P.No.16677 of 2020
UM(CO)
RRI 23/12/2020

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Ramakrishna Reddy v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Ramakrishna Reddy v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Kamalakannan Vs The commissioner

P. Ramasamy, Vs The District Collector

K.Poongavanam Vs The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Chinnaisamy Vs The District Collector

Kalimuthu Vs The State rep. by

Tvl.Sri Venkatachalam Engineering Works (P) Ltd. Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St) (Fac)