Disposed

Kancheepuram District v. State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Madras HC27 Aug 2020WP/16187/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court directed specific respondents to consider and dispose of a representation dated 14.06.2014 by the petitioner association regarding non-action on excess load in heavy vehicles within 12 weeks. Writ petition dismissed after directions.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents 3, 5, 16, 17, 19 and 22 to consider the representation of 14.06.2014 and dispose of it on merits within 12 weeks.

Kancheepuram District Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep. by — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 27.08.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.No.16187 of 2014

¶6

Kancheepuram District Stone Quarry Lease Holders Welfare Association (Reg No.239/2003), Rep. By its President K.Dhanasekar No.66, Rajendra Prasad Road, Krishna Nagar, Chrompet, Chennai – 600 055. ... Petitioner .vs . 1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its the Principal Secretary, Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 2. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Kancheepuram District.

¶7

The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Office of Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai. 4. The Revenue Divisional Office, Office of the RDO, Kancheepuram District. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District. 6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District.

¶8

The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Kancheepruam Regional Transport Office, Kancheepuram District.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Maduranthagam, Kancheepuram District.

¶11

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram District.

¶12

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sriperumputhur Kancheepuram District.

¶13

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mamallapuram, Kancheepuram District.

¶14

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Tambaram Range, Tambaram, Chennai.

¶15

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Pallavaram Range, Pallavaram, Chennai.

¶16

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Meenambakkam Range, Meenaambakkam, Chennai.

¶17

The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Poonamalee Regional Transport Office, Kancheepuram District.

¶18

The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Chengalpattu Regional Transport Office, Kancheepuram District. 17. The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Maduranthagam Regional Transport Office, Kancheepuram District. 18. The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Tambaram Regional Transport Office, Kancheepuram District.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Tiruvalluvar Regional Transport Office, Tiruvalluvar District.

¶21

The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Red Hills Regional Transport Office, Thiruvalluvar District.

¶22

The Thasildhar, Kancheepuram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

¶23

The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Tiruvalluvar District. ... Respondents

¶24

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to dispose the representation made on 14.06.2014 with the respondents.

¶25

For Petitioner : Mr.Vimal B Crimson For Respondents : Ms. A. Mathumathi, Special Govt. Pleader O R D E R

¶26

The petitioner association has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to dispose of the representation made on 14.06.2014 pertaining to the action be initiated against the vehicle owners for carrying load in the heavy vehicles.

¶27

The case of the petitioner association is that in spite of the representation dated 14.06.2014, the respondents have not taken any action sofar.

¶28

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner association submitted that in Chennai, Kancheepuram, Tiruvalluvar and Chengalpattu Districts, the respective officials have not taken any action against the wrong doers for carrying excess load in the heavy vehicles.

¶29

Ms.A.Mathumathi, , learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, submitted that the officials are

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

taking necessary action against the wrong doers for carrying excess load in the heavy vehicles, however, necessary direction may be given to the officials for disposing of the petitioner's representation.

¶32

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration that the petitioner association had given the representation as early as 14.06.2014, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent Nos. 3, 5, 16, 17, 19 and 22 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.06.2014 and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶33

With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Principal Secretary,
Transport Commissioner,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
2. The District Collector,
Office of the District Collector,
Kancheepuram District.
3. The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai,
Office of Commissioner of Police,
Vepery, Chennai.
4. The Revenue Divisional Office,
Office of the RDO, Kancheepuram District.
5. The Superintendent of Police,
Office of the Superintendent of Police,
Kancheepuram District.

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District.
7. The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Kancheepruam Regional Transport Office, Kancheepuram District.
8. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Maduranthagam, Kancheepuram District.
9. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram District.
10. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sriperumputhur Kancheepuram District.
11. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mamallapuram Kancheepuram District.
12. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Tambaram Range, Tambaram, Chennai.
13. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Pallavaram Range,
Pallavaram, Chennai.
14. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Meenambakkam Range, Meenaambakkam, Chennai.
15. The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Poonamalee Regional Transport Office, Kancheepuram District.
16. The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office,
Chengalpattu Regional Transport Office, Kancheepuram District.

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

The Regional Transport Officer,
Regional Transport Office,
Maduranthagam Regional Transport Office,
Kancheepuram District.
18. The Regional Transport Officer,
Regional Transport Office,
Tambaram Regional Transport Office,
Kancheepuram District.
19. The Regional Transport Officer,
Regional Transport Office,
Tiruvalluvar Regional Transport Office,
Tiruvalluvar District.
20. The Regional Transport Officer,
Regional Transport Office,
Red Hills Regional Transport Office,
Thiruvalluvar District.
21. The Thasildhar,
Kancheepuram Taluk,
Kancheepuram District.
22. The Superintendent of Police,
Office of Superintendent of Police,
Tiruvalluvar District.
+1cc to the Government pleader, Sr.No.28147
W.P.No.16187 of 2014
rr (co)
rr ii (17/09/2020)

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kancheepuram District v. State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kancheepuram District v. State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.v.Rajamani Vs the Assistant Engineer

B.C.Vijayalakshmi, Vs Superintendent Engineer

N.Murugan Vs the Chief Administrate

Theresa Mary Latha, Vs the Collector

E.Sampathkumari, Vs the District Collector

Mr.M.Pasupathy, Vs Mr.Ganesan