Disposed

M/s.Varalakshmi Chemind Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC4 Dec 2020WP/15475/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order addresses a petitioner's dispute over whether the Respondent had disposed of its representation dated 06.02.2019. The Court directed a copy be served upon the petitioner and granted liberty to challenge if aggrieved. The writ petition was disposed without merits.

What did the court decide?

Copy of order served on petitioner; liberty granted to challenge if aggrieved.

M/s.Varalakshmi Chemind Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Income Tax | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 04.12.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶5

W.P.No.15475 of 2020

¶6

M/s.Varalakshmi Chemind Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its General Manager Serkadu Vellore- 632 106.

¶7

..Petitioner --Vs—

¶8

The State of Tamil Nadu ,

¶9

Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Religious Endowments Department, Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 009. …Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondent herein to waive the interest and allow the Petitioner to pay the deferred tax for the year 1992 to 1997 in installments considering the petitioner's representation dated 26.02.2006 and 06.02.19.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Mahendran For Respondent : Mr.R.Swarnavel, Govt. Advocate ********* O R D E R

¶12

The prayer of the petitioner is for disposal of the petitioner’s representation dated 26.02.2006 and 06.02.2019. On 02.011.2020, this Court had recorded that as there is proof of having dispatched the representation dated 06.02.2019. the respondent could proceed to hear the petitioner and pass orders thereupon even prior to the next date of hearing of the writ petition.

¶13

When the matter is taken up today, Mr.R.Swarnavel, learned Government Advocate appearing for the Commercial Taxes Department would say that the representation has been disposed as early as on 27.08.2019 and a copy of the order has been dispatched to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, would state that no such order has been received.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

In the interests of substantial justice, let a copy be served forthwith again upon the petitioner and a copy be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner as well for onward transmission to the petitioner. The petitioner, if it is so aggrieved by the aforesaid order, is granted liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from today.

¶16

This writ petition is disposed as above. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Secretary to Government,
Commercial Taxes and Religious Endowments Department,
Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 009.
+1cc to M/s.K.Mahendran, Advocate in Sr.39273
+1cc to the Special Government Pleader in Sr.39206
W.P.No.15475 of 2020
MG(CO)
RV(22/12/2020)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Varalakshmi Chemind Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Varalakshmi Chemind Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Dhanaboopathi Vs The Chief Secretary

T.M.Mohammed Sulthan Vs The Commissioner

M/s.P.K.Vaduvammal Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Customs

K.Jagannathan, Vs the Secretary

G.Vijayan, S/O. Govindaraji Vs the Commissioner

Dell International Services India Private Limited Vs Union of India