Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking direction to conduct a supplementary exam for Police Sub-Inspector was dismissed by this court for non-prosecution as the petitioner made no appearance on two hearing dates.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.02.2020
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.NO.15347 OF 2015 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2015
Annalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. The Director, The Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Chennai 600 003. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to conduct a supplementary exam for Sub-Inspector of Police (Taluk) in Tamilnadu Police Subordinate Service and allow the petitioner to appear in the examination.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.J.Ramesh, Addl.Gov.Pleader O R D E R When the case was taken up for hearing on 19.02.2020, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the case was posted on 21.02.2020 under the caption for "dismissal". Thereafter, this case was listed today and today also no representation for the petitioner. The above facts clearly indicates that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the cases.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mst
To
The Director,
The Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Chennai 600 003.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.15695
W.P.No.15347 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
PA(CO) CS/20/07/2020
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Annalakshmi
The Director, The Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Chennai 600 003
D.Krishnakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
