Disposed

M.P.Balakrishnan,S/O.P.v. v. the Chief Engineer, General

Madras HC2 Dec 2020WP/14325/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the respondents to extend monetary benefits to the petitioner within six weeks, following their recent orders fixing his seniority and promoting him to the post of Superintendent, while disposing of the pending writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to extend all monetary benefits to the petitioner within six weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

M.P.Balakrishnan,S/O.P.v. Vs the Chief… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 02.12.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

¶5

W.P.No.14325 of 2007

¶6

M.P.Balakrishnan ..Petitioner

¶7

Vs 1.The Chief Engineer (General), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. 2.The Chief Inspector of Steam Boilers, 1^st Floor (South Side), T.N.H.B.Building, 48, Dr.Muthulakshmi Road, Adyar, Chennai – 20. .. Respondents

¶8

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned letter issued by the 1^st respondent in letter No. 3(3)/76396/02 dated 30.12.2002 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to fix the seniority of the applicant in the post of Assistant in appropriate place and also to direct the respondents to promote the applicant to the post of Superintendent the date on which his immediate junior was promoted and to grant all monetary and service benefits to the applicant.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandra Kumar

¶10

For Respondents : Mr.K.Magesh Special Government Pleader

¶11

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition the Government issued proceedings Nos.S 3(1)/76396/2001-1 and S 3 (1)/76396/2001-2, dated 30.11.2020, respectively and fixed the seniority of the petitioner in the post of Assistant and he https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ was also promoted. However, the monetary benefits have not

¶12

been extended to the petitioner.

¶13

In the light of the above submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader, this Court directs the respondents to extend all monetary benefits to the petitioner based on the proceedings Nos.S 3(1)/76396/2001-1 and S 3(1)/ 76396/2001-2, dated 30.11.2020. Such exercise shall be completed within a period six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶14

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶15

-sd-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Chief Engineer (General),
Public Works Department,
Chepauk, Chennai – 5.
2.The Chief Inspector of Steam Boilers,
1 st Floor (South Side),
T.N.H.B.Building,
48, Dr.Muthulakshmi Road,
Adyar, Chennai – 20.
C.C. to M/S.L.CHANDRA KUMAR, Advocate SR.NO.38921
C.C. To The Government Pleader SR.NO. 38872
W.P.No.14325 of 2007
AJS(CO)
RRI 21/12/2020

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.P.Balakrishnan,S/O.P.v. v. the Chief Engineer, General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.P.Balakrishnan,S/O.P.v. v. the Chief Engineer, General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Ramasamy Vs the Additional Director

Mr.v.Nandakumar(since deceased Vs v.Rajasekar and 9 Others

N. Manickam Vs the Collector

V.Muniyandi, S/O.P.Vellai Vs the Deputy Commissioner of

K.v.Kumar, Vs the District Collector of

A.Souprayane Vs Union of India