Disposed

K.Lalitha v. The Superintending Engineer

Madras HC9 Oct 2020WP/14270/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed seeking mandamus to direct respondents to consider a representation dated 09.06.2020. Court ordered petitioner to make a fresh representation with documents; 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to make fresh representation with documents to 2nd respondent. 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry and pass orders within four weeks.

K.Lalitha Vs The Superintending Engineer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:09.10.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

W.P.NO.14270 OF 2020

¶6

K.Lalitha ...Petitioner

¶7

-Vs-

¶8

1.The Superintending Engineer, CEDC/West, No.110, K V SS Complex, Thirumangalam, Chennai – 600 040.

¶9

2.Assistant Engineer (TANGEDCO), Shanthi Colony, Aminjikarai, Chennai – 600 029.

¶10

3.Rangan ...Respondents

¶11

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to consider and disposal of the representation dated 09.06.2020 pending on the file of the 2^nd respondent and pass appropriate order.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.Ravindra Ram

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.P.R.Dhilip Kumar Standing Counsel for R1 & R2

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 09.06.2020 and to take appropriate action within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶16

Mr.P.R.Dhilip Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of 1^st and 2^nd respondents submitted that the petitioner can be directed to make a fresh representation to the 2^nd respondent along with all relevant documents and necessary action will be taken in accordance with law.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

3.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be a direction to the petitioner to make a fresh representation along with all relevant documents to the 2^nd respondent and the 2^nd respondent on receipt of the representation shall conduct an enquiry by affording sufficient opportunity to the parties concerned and pass final orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶19

4.This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

¶20

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
lpp/rm
To
1.The Superintending Engineer,
CEDC/West, No.110, K V SS Complex,
Thirumangalam,
Chennai – 600 040.
2.Assistant Engineer (TANGEDCO),
Shanthi Colony, Aminjikarai,
Chennai – 600 029.
W.P.No.14270 of 2020
PA(CO)
CS/06/11/2020

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Lalitha v. The Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Lalitha v. The Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Bhoopathy Vs The Commissioner

S.Raghunathan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Minorm.K. Anuvrashini Vs the Head of the Department

V.Vidhya Vs The District Registrar

R.Selvi Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

R.Valli Vs Tamil Selvi