P.Sasikala v. The Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petitioner seeking a fresh electricity service connection via a writ of mandamus had the petition dismissed by the single judge as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.11.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.14082 of 2017
P.Sasikala ...Petitioner Vs.
- The Chairman,
TNEB, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.
2. The Assistant Engineer,
O & M, Flower Bazar, TANGEDCO,
Chennai – 600 001.
3. P.Sudarsanam
4. S.Shanthi ...Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to receive the petitioner's application and to register the application for the grant of fresh electricity service connection comprised in Old Survey No.678, Resurvey No.1275/1, measuring an extent of 1236 sq.ft. at No.74/1, 76/1 at Old No.126, New No.322, Waltax Road, Elephant Gate, Vepery, Madras in the petitioner's name on the basis of application presented by the petitioner on 06.04.2017 on getting the necessary charges within a time frame.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Kiruthika for M/s.L.G.Sahadevan For Respondents: Mr.P.R.Dilip Kumar, Standing Counsel (R1 & R2) M/s.R.Priyakumar (R3 & R4)
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Sasikala
- respondent
The Chairman, TNEB
- respondent
The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO
- respondent
P. Sudarsanam
- respondent
S. Shanthi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court