Partly allowed

Sahana Jewellery Exports Pvt. Ltd., v. Income Tax Officer

Madras HC9 Oct 2020WP/13795/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras disposed of a writ petition filed for issuance of writ of certiorari, mandamus, and stay of disputed tax demand. The court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to dispose of the stay application within four weeks and granted an interim stay of recovery until 20.11.2020.

What did the court decide?

Order of interim stay of recovery till 20.11.2020. Dir. CIT (A) to dispose stay application within 4 weeks.

Sahana Jewellery Exports Pvt. Ltd., Vs Income Tax Officer — Income Tax | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 09.10.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶5

W.P. No.13795 of 2020 and WMP. Nos.17144 and 17145 of 2020

¶6

Sahana Jewellery Exports Pvt Ltd., Rep. By its Managing Director , Mr.D.R.Ragunath, No.600, Raja Street, Coimbatore – 641 001.

¶7

.. Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward-3, No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore.

¶10

2.Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -1, No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore.

¶11

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),

¶12

3 Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 018.

¶13

(R3 impleaded by order dated 09/10/2020)

¶14

… Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the First Respondent relating to the application made by the petitioner for stay of demand for the assessment year 2017-18 and quash the order of the First Respondent in PAN AAECS7045N/2019-20 in DIN & Letter No.ITBA/Com/F/17/2019-20/1024361058(1) dated 28.01.2020 for the Assessment year 2017-18 along with the consequential order of the Second Respondent dated 09.03.2020 in C.No.117/PCIT1/CBE/AAECS7045N/2019-20 and direct the First Respondent not to treat the Petitioner as an assessee in default pending disposal of the appeal filed by the Petitioner before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Coimbatore.

¶16

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.Thanjai P.N.Chezhian For Respondent : Ms.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

Heard. Mr.Thanjai P.N. Chezhian, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.P. Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent.

¶21

The Petitioner has filed an application for stay of disputed demand arising from an orders of assessment dated 30.12.2019 passed in terms of the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

¶22

Mr.A.P. Srinivas, learned senior standing counsel would submit that Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) will dispose the stay application within a period of four (4) weeks from today after hearing the petitioner either over video conference or physical hearing as may be mutually convenient to the parties. Let the petitioner be heard and orders be passed on or before 20.11.2020. There shall be an order of interim stay of recovery till 20.11.2020.

¶23

This Writ Petition is disposed in the aforesaid terms. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

/true copy/

Sub Asst. Registrar

rkp

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

¶29

To 1.Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward-3, No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore. 2.Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -1, No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore. 3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), 3 Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 018. +1 cc to Mr.Thajai P.N.Chezhian Advocate sr33715 +1 cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas Advocate sr33719

¶30

W.P. No.13795 of 2020 and WMP. Nos.17144 and 17145 of 2020

¶31

rld(co) aa09/11/2020

¶32

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sahana Jewellery Exports Pvt. Ltd., v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahana Jewellery Exports Pvt. Ltd., v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Clean Switch India Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Tax Officer

Msc Agency (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Commissioner of Customs (Imports)

Maya Appliances Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Govindasamy Vs The Commissioner

P.Thananjayan Vs The Deputy Commissioner (Excise)

M/s.Qutbi Industrial Supplier Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)