Dismissed

S.Abirami v. The Commissioner

Madras HC21 Sept 2020WP/13040/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition sought a direction to the police to investigate a complaint and provide domestic violence protection. The court directed the police to conduct an enquiry after issuing notice to respondents and providing an opportunity of hearing, disposing of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

The 3rd respondent is directed to conduct enquiry after issuing notice to the 4th and 5th respondents with an opportunity of hearing and pass orders on merits.

S.Abirami Vs The Commissioner — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:21.09.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

W.P.No.13040 of 2020

¶6

S. Abirami (F/30) W/ o Suresh, No, 174, First Extension, Iyappa Nagar, Medavakkam, Chennai-600 100. ...Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Police, O/o The Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, O/o The Assistant Commissioner, Madipakkam Range, Chennai.

¶7

The Inspector of Police, S-10 Police Station, Pallikaranai, Chennai 600 100. 4.Mrs. Karpagam F/55, No.66, Aringar Anna Street, Medavakkam, Chennai – 600 100. 5.Mrs. Mala F/45 No.6/257, Vinat Theertha Velavan Street, Medavakkam, Chennai – 600 100. ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus by directing the 3^rd respondent to consider representation dated 31.07.2020 and consequently directing the 3^rd respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner and her family members.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.K. Anandhu For respondents: Mr. S. Karthikeyan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction, directing the 3^rd respondent to consider the complaint of the petitioner dated 31.07.2020 and provide police protection to the petitioner and her family members.

¶13

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on receipt of the complaint from the petitioner, enquiry is pending on the file of the 3^rd respondent.

¶14

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the 3^rd respondent is directed to conduct enquiry, after issuing notice to 4^th and 5^th respondents and also providing an opportunity of hearing to both the parties and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, if so advised.

¶15

With the above directions this petition is disposed off. s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar smn To 1. The Commissioner of Police, O/o The Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, O/o The Assistant Commissioner, Madipakkam Range, Chennai.

¶16

The Inspector of Police, S-10 Police Station, Pallikaranai, Chennai 600 100. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. +1 CC to Mr.K. Anandhu, Advocate sr 30784 +1 Cc to Govt. Pleader sr 31150 W.P.No.13040 of 2020 GJ(CO) SP(16/10/2020)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Abirami v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Abirami v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Amala Vs G.Saravanakumar @ Yeshwanth

A.Rajendran Vs the State Rep by

V.E.Jaishankar Vs the State Rep.by

M/s.Asahi India Glass Ltd., Vs The Inspector of Police

Dhanapal Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Vishnuram M/36 Vs The Commissioner of Police