Disposed

S.Srinivasan v. The Revenue Divisional officer

Madras HC7 Sept 2020WP/12048/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Madras issued directions to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ponneri, to conduct an enquiry regarding the petitioner's appeals by affording a full hearing opportunity and pass final orders within eight weeks of receiving the copy of the order.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the First Respondent to conduct enquiry after providing hearing opportunity and pass final orders within eight weeks.

S.Srinivasan Vs The Revenue Divisional officer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.09.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

Writ Petition No.12048 of 2020

S.Srinivasan

...Petitioner

-Vs-

1 The Revenue Divisional officer Ponneri Revenue Division, Ponneri Tiruvallur District. 2 The Tahsildar Ponneri Taluk, Ponneri Tiruvallur District. … Respondents

¶10

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1 st respondent herein to consider and pass orders on the petitioners appeals dated 18.02.2019 19.02.2019 20.02.2019 and 01.04.2019 in accordance with law by providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the third parties.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Thirumavalavan For Respondents : Mr.E.Balamurugan, Special Government Pleader O R D E R

¶12

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to take the appeals filed by the petitioner filed by the petitioner for enquiry and pass appropriate orders within the time fixed by this Court.

¶13

Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the appeals filed by the petitioner have been taken on file by the first respondent and already notices have been issued to the petitioner as well as the other interested parties to appear for enquiry on 09.09.2020 at 11.00 A.M. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner can be present during the enquiry along with all the relevant documents.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also of the fact that the first respondent has already called the parties for enquiry, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to conduct enquiry after affording sufficient opportunity to the petitioner and all the other interested parties and pass final orders strictly in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶16

This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

¶17

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1 The Revenue Divisional officer
Ponneri Revenue Division, Ponneri
Tiruvallur District.
2 The Tahsildar
Ponneri Taluk, Ponneri Tiruvallur District.
+1 cc to Mr.S.Thirumavalavan,Advocate Sr.No. 29218
+1 cc to Government Pleader,Advocate Sr.No. 29286

¶18

W.P.No.12048 of 2020

¶19

nmi(co) rv(24/9/2020)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Srinivasan v. The Revenue Divisional officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Srinivasan v. The Revenue Divisional officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thulasi Vs The Head Surveyor

M.Mohan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

A.Chinnasamy Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Rajendiran Vs The District Collector

Bnt Connection Impex Ltd. Vs Inspector General

Aravind Srinivasan Vs The Inspector General of Registration