The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by an employee challenging a pay reduction order because he had already been dismissed from service in 2018 and did not challenge that dismissal order.
No costs. The writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.03.2020
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
W.P.No.11966 of 2013
Vincent Christopher ... Petitioner
/Vs/ 1.The Chairman, TANGEDCO, 800, NPKRR Maligai, Anna Salai, Chennai - 02. 2. The Superintendent Engineer, Purchase and Administration, Mettur Thermal Power Station, Mettur Dam 636406. 3. The Executive Engineer, General Equipment Division, Mettur Thermal Power Station, Mettur Dam -636406. ... Respondents Prayer:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records connected with the proceedings of the 3rd respondent in Ku.No./Se.Po/Po.U.Ko/Me.A.Mi.Ni/Ko.Kattu.No.01/2011, dated 25.01.2011 and set aside the same, consequently direct the respondents to reimburse the petitioner all the deducted amount within the time frame that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. D. Asenthamani For Respondents : Mr. Karthik Raja
The writ petition has been filed challenging the punishment of reduction of pay for a period of one year with cumulative effect.
+1cc to M/s.D.Asenthamani, Advocate, S.R.No.23480 +1cc to Mr.Karthik Rajan, Advocate, S.R.No.22955
W.P.No.11966 of 2013
MR(CO) CB(31/07/2020)
Vincent Christopher
The Chairman, TANGEDCO
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
