Disposed

R.Thiyagarajan v. The District Collector

Madras HC7 Oct 2020WP/11673/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In W.P. No.11673 of 2020, the Hon'ble High Court directed the District Collector to consider the petitioner's representation, after a hearing involving the petitioner and TANTRANSCO representative, to pass appropriate orders within six weeks regarding the compensation and lay-out of the High power grid line.

What did the court decide?

The first respondent was directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within six weeks after hearing the parties.

R.Thiyagarajan Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.10.2020 CORAM:

¶2

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.11673 of 2020 and W.M.P.No.14322 of 2020

R.Thiyagarajan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector, Nagapattinam District, Nagapattinam.

¶7

2.The Executive Engineer, Transmission Line Construction, Tamil Nadu Construction Corporation, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

¶8

3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Transmission Line Construction, Tamil Nadu Construction Corporation, Thanjavur District.

¶9

4.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Nagapattinam District, Nagapattinam.

¶10

5.The Assistant Electricity Engineer, Sub Power Station, Vedaranyam, Nagapattinam District. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to lay the High power grid in other suitable places, instead of the petitioner's property in respect of situated inn S.No.140-2 and 140-3, Voimedu west and post, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District and to pay the compensation to the petitioner based on the respresentation of the petitioner dated 07.07.2020.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Senthilkumar

¶13

For Respondents: Mr.Annai Ezhil Government Advocate

¶14

1/3

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 07.07.2020 and pass orders in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶18

2.Mr.Annai Ezhil, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the first respondent submitted that the representation made by the petitioner has been taken on file by the first respondent and the enquiry has been fixed on 14.10.2020 at 5.00 p.m. The learned counsel submitted that the petitioner can be present for the enquiry with all relevant documents.

¶19

3.Taking into consideration, the facts and circumstances of the case and also of the fact that the first respondent has already called the petitioner for enquiry, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 07.07.2020, after hearing the petitioner and the representative of TANTRANSCO and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner has already given the particulars in the form provided by the TANTRANSCO by claiming for compensation and the same shall also be placed before the first respondent at the time of enquiry.

¶20

This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CO) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar Sgl To

¶22

1.The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector,

¶23

Nagapattinam District, Nagapattinam.

¶24

2/3

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

2.The Executive Engineer,
Transmission Line Construction,
Tamil Nadu Construction Corporation,
Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.
3.The Assistant Executive Engineer,
Transmission Line Construction,
Tamil Nadu Construction Corporation,
Thanjavur District.
4.The Superintending Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution
Corporation Ltd., Nagapattinam District, Nagapattinam.
5.The Assistant Electricity Engineer,
Sub Power Station, Vedaranyam, Nagapattinam District.
+1 cc to the Government Advocate sr33283
+1 cc to M/s.R.Murugabharathi Advocate sr33557
W.P.No.11673 of 2020
sal(co)
aa14/10/2020

¶27

3/3

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Thiyagarajan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Thiyagarajan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Raja Vs The Secretary

P.Ramanathan Vs The Commissioner of Revenue

Indrani, Vs The District Collector

Dr.Gopinath Subbaian Vs The Union of India

D.Narayanan Vs The Government of Revenue and Disaster

N.Krishna Reddy Vs The District Collector