Dismissed

Tamil Nadu Agricultural v. Commissioner of Customs

Madras HC3 Feb 2020WP/11277/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed three clubbed writ petitions filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of Central Excise adjudication orders. The court granted liberty to restore the petitions if the application under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme is rejected. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

Writs dismissed with liberty to restore if the Sabka Vishwas Scheme application is rejected; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Tamil Nadu Agricultural Vs Commissioner of Customs — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 03.02.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P. Nos. 11277 of 2015 and 5697 & 5698 of 2016 and W.M.P. Nos. 5040 & 5041 of 2016

¶6

W.P. No. 11277 of 2015:

¶7

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Rep. by its Registrar, Lawley Road, Coimbatore – 641 003. ... Petitioner

¶8

-vs-

¶9

The Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, 6/7, ATD Street, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 18. ... Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records comprised in Impugned Order C.No.V/STCS/15/57/2014 – ST/ADJ dated 31.12.2014 on the file of the respondent, quash the same.

¶11

W.P. No. 5697 of 2016:

¶12

The Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Rep. by its Registrar, Lawley Road, Coimbatore – 641 003. ... Petitioner

¶13

Office of the Superintendent of Central Excise, Rep by the Superintendent of Central Excise, Range I-A, Singapore Plaza, Cross cut Road, Coimbatore – 12. ... Respondent

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records comprised in O.C.No.55/2016, dated 03.02.2016 under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the file of the respondent, quash the same.

¶16

W.P. No. 5698 of 2016:

¶17

The Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Rep. by its Registrar, Lawley Road, Coimbatore – 641 003. ... Petitioner

¶18

-vs-

¶19

Office of the Superintendent of Central Excise, Rep by the Superintendent of Central Excise, Range I-A, Singapore Plaza, Cross cut Road, Coimbatore – 12. ... Respondent

¶20

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records comprised in O.C.No.590/2015, dated 18.08.2015, 667 of 2015 dated 28.09.2015 and 690 of 2015 dated 08.10.2015 under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the file of the respondent, quash the same.

¶21

For Petitioner in all W.P's :Mr. A. L. Somayaji, Senior Counsel For Mr. Abdul Saleem For Respondent in all W.P.'s : Mr. A. P. Srinivas Standing Counsel O R D E R

¶22

The petitioner has filed application for settling the dispute under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to restore the same, in case, the application filed under the afore said scheme is rejected. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

¶25

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶26

//True Copy//

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Commissioner of Customs,
Central Excise & Service Tax,
6/7, ATD Street, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore – 18.
2.The Superintendent of Central Excise,
O/o Superintendent of Central Excise,
Range I-A, Singapore Plaza, Cross cut Road,
Coimbatore – 12.
+1cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas (SC), Advocate Sr.8731
+3cc to M/s.Abdul saleem, Advocate Sr.8908, 8905 and 8906
W.P. Nos. 11277 of 2015 and 5697 & 5698 of 2016
rp[co]
srg 05/03/2020

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tamil Nadu Agricultural v. Commissioner of Customs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamil Nadu Agricultural v. Commissioner of Customs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Maharaja Oil Imports Vs the Assistant Commissioner

Al. Ramanathan Vs the Assistant Commissioner of

M/S. Sunbeam Generators Pvt. Vs State of Tamil Nadu

M/S.Parry Infrastructure Company P Ltd. Vs the Deputy Commisssioner of Income Tax

D.Venkataraman, Vs Assistant Commissioner (Ct)

M/s.Tebma Shipyards Ltd., Vs Assistant Commissioner of