Disposed

M/S.Sri Rama Textiles Spinning v. the Assistant Commissioner

Madras HC2 Mar 2020WP/11067/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought a direction for the respondent to decide a refund petition filed under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act and CST Act for assessment year 2008-09. The respondent undertook to pass an order within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to pass an order on the pending refund petition dated 13.03.2013 on merits within two weeks of receiving this order.

M/S.Sri Rama Textiles Spinning Vs the… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 02.03.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.No.11067 of 2013

¶6

M/s.Sri Rama Textiles Spinning Mills Ltd. Rep.by its Directeor – R.G.Balaji No.235, Mint Street Park Town Chennai-600 003. ...Petitioner

¶7

¶8

The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Park Town II Assessment Circle No.191, N.S.C.Bose Road Wavoo Complex, 5^th Floor Chennai-600 001. ...Respondent

¶9

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to pass order for the assessment year 20082009 under the CST Act, 1956 on the petition filed by the petitioner dated 13.03.2013 under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act, 2006 as expeditiously as possible.

¶10

For Petitioner : Ms.R.Hemalatha

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap,

¶12

Government Advocate (Taxes)

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This writ petition has been filed for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to pass orders for the assessment year 2008-2009 under the CST Act, 1956 on the petition filed by the petitioner dated 13.03.2013 under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act, 2006 as expeditiously as possible.

¶15

2.In the petition dated 13.03.2013 filed before the respondent, the petitioner has prayed to rectify the order passed in CST/97500/2008-2009 dated 29.03.2013 and grant refund of the excess payment of tax of Rs.16,36,175/- in terms of Notification No.II(1)/CTRE/139(b)/76 dated 19.03.1976.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

3.When this writ petition was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied if an order is passed by the respondent on the petition dated 13.03.2013 made by the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law.

¶18

4.In reply to the above submission, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent has fairly submitted that such an order would be passed within a period of two weeks.

¶19

5.Taking note of the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to pass orders on the petition dated 13.03.2013 made by the petitioner, on merits in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶20

-s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar KM To

¶21

The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Park Town II Assessment Circle No.191, N.S.C.Bose Road Wavoo Complex, 5^th Floor Chennai-600 001.

¶22

+1cc to the Special Government Pleader (Taxes),High Court, Madras.

¶23

+1cc to M/s.Hemalatha, Advocate, SR.No.18469

¶24

PPA(CO) rli(21/05/2020)

¶25

W.P.No.11067 of 2013

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Sri Rama Textiles Spinning v. the Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Sri Rama Textiles Spinning v. the Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Vinoth Vs the State Rep. by

Sri Grama Devatha Kottai Vs The District Collector

Madhu Sudhan Varma @ Pala Kuru Madhu Sudhan Varma Vs State by

M/S.Cbc Fashions (Asia) Vs the Commercial Tax Officer

Motherland Shipping Company Vs The Commissioner of Customs

M/S.Arun Smelters Ltd., Vs the Assistant Commissioner (Ct