Partly allowed

T.Kesavan Age 29 Years v. The District Registrar

Madras HC21 Aug 2020WP/11055/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge of the Madras High Court directed the Sub Registrar (second respondent) to consider a complaint regarding illegal document creation, issue notices to complainants, afford them an opportunity, and pass final orders within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the complaint, issue notices to respondents 5 to 7, afford them an opportunity, and pass final orders within eight weeks.

T.Kesavan Age 29 Years Vs The District… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 21.08.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

W.P.No.11055 of 2020 & W.M.P.No.13455 of 2020

¶6

T.Kesavan .. Petitioner
-Vs-
1. The District Registrar,
Tiruppur Registration,
Office of District Registrar,
Near Sivan Theater,
Tiruppur District.
2. The Sub Registrar,
Avinasi Circle,
Avinasi, Tiruppur District.
3. The Superintendent of Police,
Tiruppur District,
Office of Superintendent of Police,
Tiruppur District.
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Tiruppur District,
Kumaran Road, Tiruppur.
5. Bala Mani
6. Jayanthi
7. Naveen Kumar .. Respondents

¶7

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to immediately take action under Sections 82 and 83 of the Registration Act against the respondents 5 to 7 on the basis of complaint dated 23.06.2020 and pass any other further orders.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesh

¶10

For Respondents : Mr.T.M.Pappiah

¶11

Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.Aruldoss for R3 & R4

¶12

ORDER

¶13

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶14

Mr.T.M.Pappiah, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.Aruldoss, learned counsel takes notice for the respondents 3 and 4 and on consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing.

¶15

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the complaint made by the petitioner on 23.06.2020 and to take action under Sections 82 and 83 of the Registration Act against the respondents 5 to 7.

¶16

The case of the petitioner is that the respondents 5 to 7 have created certain documents illegally and therefore, the petitioner had given a complaint before the Official respondents on 23.06.2020 to take action against the respondents 5 to 7 under Section 82 and 83 of the Registration Act. Since no action was taken till date, the present Writ Petition has been filed before this Court, seeking for appropriate direction.

¶17

Heard Mr.S.Venkatesh, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr.T.M.Pappiah, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2; and Mr.Aruldoss, learned counsel for the respondents 3 and 4.

¶18

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited relief sought for in the Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider the complaint made by the petitioner on 23.06.2020 and deal with the same strictly in accordance with law. The second respondent shall issue notice to the respondents 5 to 7 and afford them opportunity before conducting the enquiry and passing final orders. The second respondent shall pass final orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

to the second respondent along with a copy of the complaint dated 23.06.2020 and all other documents and also a copy of this order.

¶21

This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶23

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rns
To
1.The District Registrar,
Tiruppur Registration,
Office of District Registrar,
Near Sivan Theater,
Tiruppur District.
2.The Sub Registrar,
Avinasi Circle,
Avinasi, Tiruppur District.
3.The Superintendent of Police,
Tiruppur District,
Office of Superintendent of Police,
Tiruppur District.
4.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Tiruppur District,
Kumaran Road, Tiruppur.
+1 cc to M/s.S.Venkatesh, Advocate Sr.No. 27553
+1 cc to The Government Pleader, Sr.No. 27534
W.P.No.11055 of 2020 &
W.M.P.No.13455 of 2020
VD(CO)
RMP(02/11/2020)

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Kesavan Age 29 Years v. The District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Kesavan Age 29 Years v. The District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh alias Rajesh krishnan Vs The District Registrar

B.Kanagaraj Vs The District collector

Annalakshmi Vs The District Collector

M. Rakesh Vs Dr.Chand Usmani

K.Amaresan Vs The Deputy Registrar

The Vethathiri Maharishi Institute for Spiritual and Institutional Education. Vs The Vice Chancellor