Dismissed

M.Vennila v. the District Collector

Madras HC21 Jan 2020WP/1101/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as withdrawn. The petitioner sought liberty to pursue the effective alternative remedy available under Section 258 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 by way of an election petition.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to resort to the alternative remedy under Section 258 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994.

M.Vennila Vs the District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 21.01.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

¶5

W.P. No. 1101 of 2020 and W.M.P. No. 1312 of 2020

¶6

M. Vennila ... Petitioner
-vs-
1. The District Collector,
Krishnagiri.
2. The State Level Scrutiny Committee,
Rep. by its Chairman,
Adi-Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department,
Fort. St. George,
Chennai - 600 009.

¶7

The District Election Officer,
Krishnagiri.

¶8

The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Krishnagiri.

¶9

Saraswathi ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Third Respondent pertaining to the rejection of the nomination of the Petitioner and quash the same as well as the election of the Fifth Respondent and consequently direct the First to Fourth Respondents to conduct fresh elections for the post of "President" of Vellaikuttai Panchayat by permitting the petitioner to contest the fresh elections.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr. P. Valliappan

¶12

For Respondents: Mr. V. Jayaprakash Narayanan, Government Pleader (for R1 to R4)

¶13

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

Mr. V. Jayaprakash Narayanan, Learned Government Pleader takes notice for the First to Fourth Respondents.

¶17

When it is pointed out by the Learned Government Pleader appearing for the First to Fourth Respondents that the Petitioner has got an effective alternative remedy by way of election petition under Section 258 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to resort to the same and he has also made an endorsement to that effect, which is recorded.

¶18

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
granting such liberty. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous
Petition is closed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vjt
To
1.The District Collector,
Krishnagiri.
2.The Chairman,
State Level Scrutiny Committee,
Adi-Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department,
Fort. St. George,
Chennai - 600 009.
3.The District Election Officer,
Krishnagiri.
4.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Krishnagiri.
+1cc to M/s.P.Valliappan, Advocate SR.4242
W.P. No. 1101 of 2020
GP(CO)
CB(11/02/2020)

¶19

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Vennila v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Vennila v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Ganaesan Vs The Chief Election Commissioner

A.Rajeshwari Vs The Tamil nadu State Election Commission

G.Sathish, Vs The Election Commissioner

C.Vellingiri Vs The Assistant Director

E.Prabudoss, Vs The District Collector

Vasantha Vs The Inspector General of