Dismissed

All India Karate-Do Federation v. Union of India, through

Madras HC3 Feb 2020WP/1100/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed the writ petition filed by the All India Karate-Do Federation seeking mandamus against respondents for alleged illegal recognition of other bodies, as the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

All India Karate-Do Federation Vs Union… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.02.2020 CORAM

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶3

W.P. No.1100 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2011

¶4

All India Karate-Do Federation, Rep. by its President, Mr.Karate R.Thiagarajan.

... Petitioner

1.Union of India,

through Director (Sports), Department of Youth Affairs & Sports, 520 C Wing, Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi – 110 001.

¶9

2.Indian Olympic Association (IOA), Through General Secretary, Olympic Bhavan,

¶10

Qutub Institutional Area, New Delhi – 110 016.

¶11

3.P.R.Ramesh

¶12

4.R.Ganesh

¶13

5.S.Karthikeyan

¶14

6.The Secretary,

¶15

Stadium Management Committee, Koramangala Indoor Stadium, 80 feet Road, Koramangala, Bangalore – 560 095. ... Respondents

¶16

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondents to initiate appropriate action in accordance with law on the basis of the representation sent by the petitioner dated 12.01.2011 against the third and fourth respondents for acting illegally/fraudulently by claiming themselves to have been recognized by the first and second

¶17

1/3

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

respondents herein and consequently forbearing the third to fifth respondents from doing anything based on the false representation with reference to the petitioner federation.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Velmurugan For R1 & R2 : Served – No appearance For R3 & R4 : Mr.K.Maheswaran For R5 : Mr.Vijay Ganesh

¶21

ORDER

¶22

The learned counsel for the petitioner in this writ petition seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.

¶23

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶24

vsi2/ah

¶25

¶26

1.The Director (Sports), Union of India, Department of Youth Affairs & Sports, 520 C Wing, Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi – 110 001.

¶27

2.The General Secretary, Indian Olympic Association (IOA), Olympic Bhavan, Qutub Institutional Area, New Delhi – 110 016.

¶28

2/3

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

3.The Secretary, Stadium Management Committee, Koramangala Indoor Stadium, 80 feet Road, Koramangala, Bangalore – 560 095.

¶31

+1 cc to Mr.M.Velumurugan Advocate sr8391

W.P. No.1100 of 2011

spd(co) aa09/03/2020

3/3

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

All India Karate-Do Federation v. Union of India, through

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

All India Karate-Do Federation v. Union of India, through

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Lakshmi Kumar Thathachari, Vs the Executive Trustee

C.Azeezur Rahman, Vs the Tahsildar

S.Zakir Hussain Vs the Chief Executive Officer

K.Palanikumar, Vs the State Election Commission

S.Rathinakumari, Vs the Managing Director

The Town Club, Vs the District Collector