Dismissed

The State of Tamilnadu v. Tvl. P.Nallu Udayar

Madras HC9 Mar 2020WP/10742/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition challenging an order by the Taxation Special Tribunal. The dismissal resulted from the petitioner's earlier non-compliance with the Court's directions regarding registry requirements, rendering the petition liable to be dismissed automatically. The second respondent was dismissed as a formal party.

What did the court decide?

Writ of Certiorari dismissed on account of previous dismissal due to non-compliance; second respondent dismissed as a formal party.

The State of Tamilnadu Vs Tvl. P.Nallu Udayar — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 09.03.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

¶5

W.P.No.10742 of 2005

¶6

The State of Tamil Nadu,

¶7

rep. by Deputy Commissioner (CT), Salem Division, Salem. ... Petitioner -Vs1.Tvl.P.Nallu Udayar, Proprietor, Sri Rajalakshmi Rice and Oil Mills, Rasipuram. 2.The Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Taxation Special Tribunal, Chennai. ... Respondent

¶8

Prayer : Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of the second respondent pertaining to the order dated 29.08.2000 made in T.C.(R).No.2793 of 1997 and quash the same as illegal.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Swarnavel

¶10

Government Advocate (Taxes)

¶11

For 1st Respondent : Dismissed.

¶12

Vide Court Order dated 30.06.2014

¶13

ORDER

¶14

(Order of the Court was made by DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.)

¶15

Against the 1st Respondent/Assessee/Contesting Respondent under the order of the Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 30th June 2014, the writ petition stood dismissed for want of compliance on the part of the Petitioner/Revenue. The order dated 30.06.2014 of the Coordinate Bench of this Court is quoted below for ready reference.

¶16

"The above matter is listed today i.e. 30.6.2014, under the caption 'Writ Notice Section Default Cases', for non-compliance of the requirements of the Registry.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The concerned counsels are directed to comply with the requirements of the Registry, on or before 14.7.2014.

¶19

On non-compliance of the requirements of the Registry, on or before the specified date, as directed by this Court, the WP shall stand dismissed, automatically, without further reference to this Court."

¶20

2.As far as the 2nd Respondent is concerned, the same being only a formal and proforma party, the present Writ Petition requires no further consideration by this Court and the same is liable to be dismissed and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs.

¶21

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO MDU)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Sgl
To
1.The Registrar,
The Tamil Nadu Taxation Special Tribunal,
Chennai
+1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.21782
W.P.No.10742 of 2005
SSV(CO)
GMY(22/05/2020)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The State of Tamilnadu v. Tvl. P.Nallu Udayar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Tamilnadu v. Tvl. P.Nallu Udayar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Murugan and Co. Vs the Union of India

A.Azizul Karim Vs P.S.Kirubakaran

David Tyagaraj Vs Daphne Dilip James

M/S. Greenland Exports Pvt. Vs the Commercial Tax Officer

M/S.Shyam Textiles Ltd, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

M/S. the Coimbatore Vs the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax