Disposed

P. Lakshmi, W/O. Pandiyan, v. The District Collector

Madras HC30 Nov 2020WP/1064/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding issuance of a separate patta for property in Ariyalure District within six weeks, after issuing notice to interested parties, without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Directive to the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders on merits after issuing notice to interested parties within six weeks.

P. Lakshmi, W/O. Pandiyan, Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 30.11.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

W.P.No.1064 of 2017

P.Lakshmi

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector,

¶10

Collector Office, Ariyalure District.

¶11

2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Sendhurai Taluk, Ariyalure District.

¶12

3.The Tahsildar, Sendhurai Taluk, Ariyalure District. ... Respondents

¶13

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the 3^rd respondent to issue separate patta to the petitioner name to the petitioner property in S.F.No.175/11 situated at Maruvathur Village, Sendhurai Post, Ariyalure District having an extent of 13 cents by considering the petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2016 within a time frame.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Maganathan

¶15

For Respondents: Ms.A.Madhumathi,

¶16

Special Government Pleader

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3^rd respondent to issue separate patta to the petitioner in respect of the property in S.F.No.175/11 situated at Maruvathur Village, Sendhurai Post, Ariyalure District measuring an extent of 13 cents by considering the petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2016.

¶19

2.It is the case of the petitioner that though she has given her representation as early as on 14.12.2016 for issuance of patta, the 3^rd respondent has not passed any order so far.

¶20

3.Ms.A.Madhumathi, learned Special Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ appearing for the respondents submitted that the land in

¶21

question was surveyed and the Surveyor had also filed a report dated 12.01.2017, however, the 3^rd respondent has not passed any order so far. Further, the learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2016 shall be considered by the 3^rd respondent in accordance with law, after issuing notice to all the interested parties.

¶22

4.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 3^rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2016 and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to all the interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

5.With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed
of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
va
To
1.The District Collector,
Collector Office, Ariyalure District.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
District Revenue Office,
Sendhurai Taluk,
Ariyalure District.
3.The Tahsildar,
Sendhurai Taluk,
Ariyalure District.
W.P.No.1064 of 2017
BR CO
SDR 15/12/2020

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P. Lakshmi, W/O. Pandiyan, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Lakshmi, W/O. Pandiyan, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Srinivasan Vs The Inspector General of

Dr.Lakshminarayanan Vs the Estate Officer/Tiruvarur

N.Sarasu, F/60 Vs The Inspector General of

K.Selvarajan Vs The Commissioner

Tmt.K.Bhagavathi Sundari Vs The Government of

S.Periyasamy, Vs The Superintendent of Police