The Single Judge allowed an application to implead the petitioner as a respondent in an underlying writ petition, having heard counsel and accepting the affidavit filed in support.
Petition to implead the petitioner as a respondent in the underlying W.P.No.1718 of 2020 was allowed and ordered accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P.No.3840 of 2020
W.M.P.No.3840 of 2020 in
W.P.No.1718 of 2020
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and P.VELMURUGAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.)
This petition has been filed to implead the petitioner as respondent in the above petition.
2.Heard the parties. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has got no objection in allowing this petitioner. Further, this Court is convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition to implead the petitioner as party to the
proceedings. Hence, this petition is ordered as prayed for.
(N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.) 12.02.2020
ay
Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the cause title.
W.M.P.No.3840 of 2020
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.
and
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
ay
W.M.P.No.3840 of 2020
in
W.P.No.1718 of 2020
Dated : 12.02.2020
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be impleaded as a respondent in W.P.No.1718 of 2020.
N.Kirubakaran
N.Kirubakaran
P.Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
