Petitioner filed a miscellaneous petition to condone a 92-day delay in restoring W.P.No.11698/2004. The court heard counsel, examined the supporting affidavit, and was satisfied with the reasons provided, thereby condoning the delay and ordering the petition.
Delay of 92 days in filing restoration petition was condoned based on the affidavit filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P.No.2614 of 2020 in W.P.No.11698 of 2004 K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J.
This petition is filed to
condone the delay of 92 days in filing
the restoration petition in
W.P.No.11698/2004.
2. Heard the learned counsel
for the petitioner. Perused the
affidavit filed in support of the
petition.
3. On being satisfied with the
reasons stated in the affidavit filed in
support of the petition, the delay is
condoned. This miscellaneous
petition is ordered.
20.02.2020
vsi
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 92 days in filing the restoration petition should be condoned.
Whether the reasons stated in the affidavit satisfy the requirements for condoning the delay.
Petitioner
Respondent
K.Ravichandrababu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
