A.Sehar v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed Writ Appeal No.894 of 2020 as withdrawn by the appellant, based on a representation from counsel and a letter circulated to the Registry.
What the court decided
W.A.(MD)No.894 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.11.2020 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.A.(MD)No.894 of 2020 and
C.M.P.(MD)No.4892 of 2020
A.Sehar : Appellant/Respondent No 4
Vs.
1.The Commissioner,
Municipal Administration, Chennai – 600 005.
2.The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Rajendra Chatram, Leigh Bazaar Road, Arisipalayam, Salem.
3.The Commissioner, Kulithalai Municipality, Municipal Office, Kulithalai – 639 104, Karur District. : Respondent 1 to 3/1 to 3
4.Murugan : Respondent No.4/Petitioner
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the order dated 10.03.2020 made in W.P.(MD)No.7923 of 2019.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A Sehar
- respondent
Murugan
- respondent
The Commissioner, Municipal Administration, Chennai
- respondent
The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Salem
- respondent
The Commissioner, Kulithalai Municipality
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court