C.Sowmiya v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
Candidates challenging recruitment selection lists cannot question brochure terms after participating. This court upheld the validity of the Board's selection based on age priority for ties, dismissing the appeal.
What did the court decide?
No order as to costs.
What the court decided
W.A(MD)No.628 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:26.08.2020 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
W.A(MD)No.628 of 2020 in C.M.P.(MD)No. 3973 of 2020 Against WP(MD)No.2959 of 2020
C.Sowmiya
... Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Office Campus,
Pantheon Road,
Egmore,
Chennai-08.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the tie-breaker mechanism based on age in the recruitment brochure governs the selection process and bars interference under Section 7(2) of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of S
Whether the selection committee erred in not considering the petitioner within the zone of consideration based on the rank list.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
C.Sowmiya
- respondent
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Chennai
Coram
M.SATHYANARAYANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court