K.Mahalingam v. S.Viswanathan
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against a High Court order directing promotion; appellant sought withdrawal with liberty to file recall; Court permitted withdrawal, dismissed appeal.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the writ appeal with liberty to file a recall or review application before the Single Judge.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.08.2020
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.AMRESHWAR PRATAP SAHI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.A.No.652 of 2020 and CMP No.9217 of 2020
K. Mahalingam .. Appellant/Respondent 5
Vs
1.S. Viswanathan
2. The Chairman,
Chennai Port Trust,
Chennai 01.
3. The Deputy Chairman,
Chennai Port Trust,
Chennai 01.
4. The Secretary,
Chennai Port Trust,
Chennai 01
5. The Chief Mechanical Engineer,
Chennai Port Trust,
Chennai 01 .. Respondents/Petitioners 1 to 4
Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters of Patent to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P No. 30413 of 2013 dated 10.07.2020.
W.P.30413/2013:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 1st Respondent in his proceedings CME/A1/1010/12/MEE dated 24.06.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents herein to promote the Petitioner to the Post of Deputy Chief Mechanical Engineer (Mechanical) from 24.06.2013 with all monetary and other attendant benefits.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Mahalingam
- respondent
S. Viswanathan
- respondent
The Chairman, Chennai Port Trust
- respondent
The Deputy Chairman, Chennai Port Trust
- respondent
The Secretary, Chennai Port Trust
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court