Partly allowed

T.Perumal v. the Chairman

Madras HC6 Jul 2020WA/418/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an appeal against a writ petition quashing an official order, the High Court upheld the lower court's conclusion. The court disposed of the appeal with liberty for the appellant to make a representation for accommodation upon joining the transferred place.

What did the court decide?

Writ Appeal disposed of with liberty to appellant to make a representation for suitable accommodation upon joining the transferred place.

T.Perumal Vs the Chairman — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 06.07.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr.A.P.SAHI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶7

W.A.No.418 of 2019
and C.M.P.No.6548 of 2020
T.Perumal ... Appellant
-vs-
1.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
800, Anna Salai, NPK RR Maaligai,
Chennai 600 002.
2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel)
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
800, Anna Salai, NPK RR Maaligai,
Chennai 600 002.
3.The Assistant Executive Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
SRMC Complex, Porur,
Chettiar Agaram Road,
Chennai 600 077. ... Respondents

¶8

Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 25.11.2019 in W.P.No.31187 of 2019 on the file of this Court.

¶9

Prayer in W.P.No.31187 of 2019:

¶10

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to calling for the records of the 2^nd Respondent bearing Memo No.024650/402/G25/G251/2019-1 dated 10/06/2019 and quash the same.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

For Appellant : Mr.M.Rajendiran

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.Karthik Rajan Stdg. Counsel.

¶14

JUDGMENT

¶15

(Delivered by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶16

Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent Electricity Board, we are satisfied that there is no such error so as to warrant interference with the conclusion drawn by the learned Single Judge.

¶17

2.However, keeping in view the fact that the appellant's counsel has urged that the appellant will join at the transferred place and then make a representation or a request for his suitable accommodation, we dispose of this appeal with liberty to the appellant to make a representation provided he joins at the transferred place, which shall then be considered by the competent authority and appropriate orders shall be passed thereon as expeditiously as possible.

¶18

With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Appeal stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.6548 of 2020 is closed.

¶19

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VI)

¶20

//True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

sra

1.The Chairman,

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, NPK RR Maaligai, Chennai 600 002.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, NPK RR Maaligai, Chennai 600 002.

¶28

3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, SRMC Complex, Porur, Chettiar Agaram Road, Chennai 600 077.

¶29

W.A.No.418 of 2020
svi[co]
srg 03/08/2020

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Perumal v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Perumal v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.K.M.Senthamizhselvan Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

Air India Ltd. Vs Capt.Lakshmi Krishna Kumar

The Manager Vs C.Sagayaraj

S.Deivasigamani Vs the Government of Tamilnadu Rep. by

M/S.Ex Service Man Enterprises Vs the Traffic Manager

K.Sivagnanam, Vs the Director of Medical and Rural Health Services