Allowed

M/S.Bhimaas Engineering and Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Madras HC28 Oct 2020TCA/66/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. Relying on the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, the Court directed the appellant to file Form No.I for the scheme. The judgment disposed of the matter without deciding the substantial question of law regarding sales commission, leaving it open subject to the scheme declaration.

What did the court decide?

Appellant directed to file Form No.I under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 by 19.11.2020; appeal disposed with liberty to restore if scheme declaration is rejected.

M/S.Bhimaas Engineering and Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 28.10.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶7

Tax Case Appeal No.66 of 2020

¶8

M/s.Bhimaas Engineering & Projects Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-34 ...Appellant

¶9

The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 1(2),

¶10

Chennai–34. ...Respondent

¶11

APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, Chennai, dated 21.3.2019 made in I.T.A.No.2907/ Chny/2018 for the assessment year 2015-16.

¶12

Against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Chennai, dated 18.07.2018 made in ITA No.111/ CIT(A)-1/2017-18 and against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Corporate Circle 1(2), Chennai, dated 27.12.2017 made in PAN/GIR No.AAFCB7970G for the assessment year 2015-16.

¶13

For Appellant : Mr.G.Baskar For Respondent : Mr.T.Ravikumar, SSC

¶14

Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J

¶15

This appeal has been filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity) challenging the order dated 21.3.2019 made in I.T.A.No.2907/Chny/2018 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, 'C' Bench ('the Tribunal' for brevity) for the assessment year 2015-16.

¶16

The assessee preferred this appeal on the following substantial question of law:

¶17

“Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in disallowing the sales

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

commission paid ?”

¶20

We have heard Mr.G.Baskar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/assessee and Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent/Revenue.

¶21

The learned counsel for the appellant/assessee, on instructions, submits that the appellant/assessee intends to avail the benefit of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme ('VVS Scheme' for brevity) and in this regard, the assessee is taking steps to file the application/ declaration in Form No.I.

¶22

It may not be necessary for this Court to decide the substantial question of law raised for consideration on account of certain subsequent developments. The Government of India enacted the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) to provide for resolution of disputed tax and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The Act of the Parliament received the assent of the President on 17^th March 2020 and published in the Gazette of India on 17^th March 2020.

¶23

In terms of the said Act, the assessee has been given an option to put an end to the tax disputes, which may be pending at different levels either before the First Appellate Authority or before the Tribunal or before the High Court or before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Under Section 2(j) “disputed tax” has been defined. In terms of Section 3, where a declarant means a person, who files a declaration under Section 4 on or before the last date files a declaration to the designated authority in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 in respect of tax arrears, then, notwithstanding anything contained in the Income Tax Act or any other law for the time being in force, the amount payable by the declarant shall be determined in terms of Section 3(a-c) thereunder.

¶24

The First Proviso to Section 3 states that in case, where an appeal or writ petition or special leave petition is filed by the Income Tax authority on any issue before the Appellate Forum, the amount payable shall be one-half of the amount in the table stipulated in Section 3 calculated on such issue, in such a manner as may be prescribed. The Second Proviso deals with the cases, where the matter is before the Commissioner (Appeals) or before the Dispute Resolution Panel. The Third Proviso deals with cases, where the issue is pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The filing of the declaration is as per Section 4 of the Act and the particulars to be furnished are also mentioned in the Sub-Sections of Section 4. Section 5 of the Act deals with the time and manner of the payment and Section 6 deals with immunity from initiation of proceedings in respect of offence and imposition of penalty in certain cases. Section 9 of the Act deals with cases, where

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

the Act 3 of 2020 will not be applicable.

¶27

As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration to be filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a miscellaneous petition for restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the Division Bench for orders.

¶28

In the light of the above, we direct the appellant/ assessee to file Form No.I on or before 19.11.2020 and the Competent Authority shall process the application/declaration in accordance with the Act and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date, on which, the declaration is filed in the proper form.

¶29

With this direction, the tax case appeal stands
disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and Consequently,
the substantial question of law are left open. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Insp.Cell)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,
Corporate Circle 1(2), Chennai–34.
3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I,
121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-34
+1cc to M/s.G.Baskar, Advocate, Sr.No.34990

¶30

T.C.A.No.66 of 2020

¶31

rr ii (03/12/2020)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Bhimaas Engineering and Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Bhimaas Engineering and Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nannusamy Mohan (Huf) Vs the Assistant Commissioner Income Tax

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S.Hanon Automotive System India Privite Ltd.

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shri Rakesh Sarin

M/S.Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited Vs Mageswari Ravikumar I.A.S

M/S Thanthi Trust Vs the Director of Income Tax

Uma Maheswari Vs Stalin Josephraj(Died)