Disposed

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Shri Vipul Munoth

Madras HC24 Nov 2020TCA/364/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act was disposed of due to a subsequent event where the respondent filed a declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The court granted liberty to restore the appeal if the scheme decision is unfavorable, left the substantial questions of law open, and ordered no costs.

What did the court decide?

Liberty restored if Vivad Se Vishwas decision is adverse; substantial questions of law left open; no costs.

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shri Vipul Munoth — Income Tax | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.11.2020

¶2

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Tax Case Appeal No.364 of 2020

¶4

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corporate Ward 10(5), Chennai ...Appellant

¶5

Vs Shri Vipul Munoth ...Respondent APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 06.12.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai made in I.T.A.No.3519/Chny/2018 for the assessment year 2015-16. Appeal against the order dated 31/10/2018 in I.T.A.No.135/CIT(A) 12/2017-18 on the file of The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-12), Chennai for the Assessment year 2015-16 against the order of Income Tax officer dt.28/12/2017 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 made in PAN/GIR/NO:ANHV8201A. For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan, SSC For Respondent: Mr.P.Hari Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J This appeal has been filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity) challenging the order dated 06.12.2019 made in I.T.A.No.3519/Chny/2018 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, 'A' Bench ('the Tribunal' for brevity) for the assessment year 2015-16.

¶6

The above appeal has been admitted on 15.10.2020 on the following substantial questions of law: “i. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right and justified in setting aside the order passed by the Assessing Officer to re-examine the matter when the Assessing Officer has already duly examined the matter before passing the assessment order ? and

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

ii. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right and justified in remitting the issue back to the file of the Assessing Officer and shifting the onus to the Revenue with a direction that the Assessing Officer shall bring on record the role of the assessee in promoting the company and the relationship of the assessee, if any, with the promoters, role of the assessee in inflating the price of shares, etc.?”

¶9

We have heard Mr.M.Swaminathan, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.P.Hari, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee.

¶10

The learned counsel on behalf of the respondent/assessee submits that the assessee already filed the declaration/undertaking under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme on 20.11.2020 and is awaiting orders to be passed in Form No.3.

¶11

In the light of the subsequent event, the Competent Authority shall process the application/declaration in accordance with the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible. The assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a miscellaneous petition for restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the appropriate Division Bench for orders.

¶12

The tax case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and Consequently, the substantial questions of law framed are left open. No costs.

¶13

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy//

¶14

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶15

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

¶18

1 The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai.

¶19

2 The Commissioner of Income tax (Appeal)12, Chennai.

¶20

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corporate Ward 10(5), Chennai

¶21

+1cc to M/s.M.Saminathan, Advocate SR.NO.37906

¶22

TCA.No.364 of 2020 RP CO SDR 11/12/2020

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Shri Vipul Munoth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Shri Vipul Munoth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Prl Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Pushpa Bai

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Sri Lakshmi Ammal Educational Trust

M/S.Mjd Construction and Engineering Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Vs P.K.Vaduvammal

Maruthi Poly Bags Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

M/S.Jaya Educational Trust Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S.K.K.P. Textiles Pvt. Ltd.