Disposed

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Smt Ankita

Madras HC5 Nov 2020TCA/254/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Tax Case Appeal filed by the Revenue against the ITAT order under Substantial Questions of Law. However, the court stayed proceedings as the respondent intended to utilize the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee was granted liberty to restore the appeal if the declaration under the Scheme was not in their favor.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to file Form No.I under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act by 02.12.2020; appeal disposed with liberty to restore on failure of scheme application.

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Smt Ankita — Income Tax | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.11.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

T.C.A.No.254 of 2020

¶7

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corporate Circle 10(1) Chennai. ..Appellant

¶8

Versus

¶9

Smt Ankita Door No.1089, B-1201, Sankheshwara Serenity, Poonamallee High Road, Vepery, Chennai, PAN:ALSPA 9931 D ..Respondent

¶10

Prayer:- This Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ''D'' Bench, Chennai dated 16.12.2019 passed in I.T.A.No.3142/Chny/2018 relating to the Assessment Year 201314 against the order dated 31/07/2018 made in ITA.No.74/CIT(A)12/2016-17 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)12, Chennai and against the order dated 30/03/2016 passed by the Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 10(1), Chennai 34 for the assessment year 2013-14.

¶11

For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan Senior Standing counsel assisted by Ms.V.Pushpa Junior Standing counsel

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.Ashokpathi For M/s.Pass Associates

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

JUDGMENT

¶15

[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]

¶16

This appeal has been filed by the Revenue under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity), is directed against the order dated 16.12.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai ('the Tribunal' for brevity) in I.T.A.No.3142/Chny/2018 for the Assessment Year 2013-14. This appeal was admitted on 01.09.2020 on the following Substantial Questions of Law:

¶17

“1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right and justified in setting aside the order passed by the assessing officer to re-examine the matter when the assessing officer has already duly examined the matter before passing the assessment order?

¶18

Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in justified in remitting the issue back to the file of the assessing officer and shifting the onus to the Revenue with a direction that the assessing officer shall bring on record the role of the assessee in promoting the company and the relationship of the assessee, if any with the promotors, role of the assessee in inflating the price of shares etc.,”

¶19

We have heard Mr.M.Swaminathan, learned Senior Standing counsel assisted by Ms.V.Pushpa, learned Junior Standing counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.Ashok Pathi for M/s.Pass Associates, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee.

¶20

The learned counsel for the respondent / assessee, on instructions, submitted that the respondent / assessee intends to avail the benefit of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme ('VVS Scheme' for brevity) and in this regard, the assessee is taking steps to file the application / declaration in Form No.I.

¶21

It may not be necessary for this Court to decide the Substantial Questions of Law framed for consideration on account of certain subsequent developments. The Government of India enacted the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) to provide for resolution of disputed tax and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The Act of the Parliament received the assent of the President on 17^th March 2020 and published in the Gazette of India on 17^th March 2020.

¶22

In terms of the said Act, the assessee has been given an option to put an end to the tax disputes, which may be pending at different levels either before the First Appellate Authority

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

or before the Tribunal or before the High Court or before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Under Section 2(j) “disputed tax” has been defined. In terms of Section 3, where a declarant means a person, who files a declaration under Section 4 on or before the last date files a declaration to the designated authority in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 in respect of tax arrears, then, notwithstanding anything contained in the Income Tax Act or any other law for the time being in force, the amount payable by the declarant shall be determined in terms of Section 3(a-c) thereunder.

¶25

The First Proviso to Section 3 states that in case, where an Appeal or Writ Petition or Special Leave Petition is filed by the Income Tax authority on any issue before the Appellate Forum, the amount payable shall be one-half of the amount in the table stipulated in Section 3 calculated on such issue, in such a manner as may be prescribed. The second proviso deals with the cases, where the matter is before the Commissioner (Appeals) or before the Dispute Resolution Panel. The third proviso deals with cases, where the issue is pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The filing of the declaration is as per Section 4 of the Act and the particulars to be furnished are also mentioned in the Sub Sections of Section 4. Section 5 of the Act deals with the time and manner of the payment and Section 6 deals with Immunity from initiation of proceedings in respect of offence and imposition of penalty in certain cases. Section 9 of the Act deals with cases, where the Act 3 of 2020 will not be applicable.

¶26

As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration to be filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a Miscellaneous Petition for Restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the Division Bench for orders.

¶27

In the light of the above, we direct the respondent / assessee to file the Form No.I on or before 02.12.2020 and the competent authority hall process the application / declaration in accordance with the Act and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date on which the declaration is filed in the proper form.

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

With this direction, the Tax Case Appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and Consequently, the Substantial Questions of Law are left open. No costs.

¶30

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Kak
To
1.The Deputy/Registrar,
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
'D' Bench, Chennai.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeals 12, Chennai.
3.The Income Tax Officer, NCW 10(1),Chennai.
4.The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Non Corporate Circle 10(1), Chennai.
+1cc to M/s.G.Baskar, Advocate, S.R.No.36046
+1cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate, S.R.No.36024
T.C.A.No.254 of 2020
SAI(CO)
KKV/16/12/2020

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Smt Ankita

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Smt Ankita

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Ramalingam Vs K.S.Sundaram

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs the Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd.

M/S.Sundaram Fasteners Vs the Assistant Commissiioner of

Spr Builders, NO.57 Narayana Vs the Income Tax Officer

The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shri Anil Kumar Jain

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shi Mithalal Bhanmal