Easwari v. Papathi
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal, filed under Section 100 CPC against a judgment reversing a decree, was dismissed because the learned counsel reported that the parties had settled the dispute out of court. The appellants are entitled to a refund of court fees.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as settled out of court; Appellants entitled to refund of court fee.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.08.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Second Appeal No.84 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 (Heard through video conferencing)
1.Easwari W/o A.K.Muthuswamy 2.A.K.Muthuswamy S/o Ramasamy Gounder Both are residing at Anganagounden Pudur, Malayadipudur Village, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District. ... Appellants Vs 1.Pappathi W/o Muthusamy Malayadipudur Village, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District. 2.Subramaniam, S/o Marappan 3.Selvakumar, S/o Marappan 4.Marannan S/o Ramasamy 5.Singari W/o Marannan 6.Nagappan S/o Ramasamy 7.Vijayan S/o Marannan
Respondents 2 to 7 are residing at Sayubu Thottam, Malayadipudur Village, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District.
(Address as given in the decree in O.S.No.295/2004 is Ravuthampalayam Village, Avinasi Taluk).
8.Palanisamy S/o Marappan, Indira Nagar, Malayadipudur Village, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal can be dismissed as the parties have settled the matter out of court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Easwari W/o A.K.Muthuswamy
- appellant
A.K.Muthuswamy S/o Ramasamy Gounder
- respondent
Pappathi W/o Muthusamy
- respondent
Subramaniam S/o Marappan
- respondent
Selvakumar S/o Marappan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court