This second appeal was dismissed for default because the appellant failed to comply with representations to file a petition impleading the legal heirs of the deceased third respondent after they had died.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.01.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
S.A.No. 686 of 2001
Arumugam
..Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.Ramasamy Chettiar
2.Govindasamy Chettiar
3.Arasalammal
4.Natarajan
5.Subramani
6.Sekar
7.Sankar ..Respondents/Defendants
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section. 100 of C.P.C. against
the judgment and decree dated 28.04.2000 in A.S.No. 9 of 2000 on
the file of the Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri at
Krishnagiri, confirming the judgment and decree dated 16.11.1999
in O.S.No.151 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif cum
Judicial Magistrate, Uthanagarai.
For Appellant : M/s.Selvi George
For Respondents
For R1 : Mr.P.Mani
For R2 : Died
For R3 : Died
J U D G M E N T
This second appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 28.04.2000 in A.S.No. 9 of 2000 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri at Krishnagiri, confirming the judgment and decree dated 16.11.1999 in O.S.No.151 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthanagarai.
1/2
and even then, the appellant did not take any steps to implead the legal heirs of the third respondent.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:-
1. The Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri,
Krishnagiri.
2. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,
Uthanagarai.
AKM/03.03.2020 /2p-3c/
S.A.No. 686 of 2001
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal should be dismissed after the appellant failed to file a petition to implead the legal heirs of the deceased third respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arumugam
Ramasamy Chettiar
G.K. Ilangkaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
