Mr.Devarajulu v. Mrs.Sanjeevi
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal was dismissed for default as the appellant had died and no representation was filed. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What the court decided
S.A.No.453 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:05.08.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Second Appeal No.453 of 2010
and
M.P.No.1 of 2010
Mr.Devarajulu .. Appellant
/versus/
1.Mrs.Sanjeevi
2.Mrs.Rukmani
3.Mr.Vasanthakumar
4.Mr.K.Lakshmanan Reddy
5.Minor L.Jayakumar
6.Minor L.Kamalesh
Minors 5 and 6 represented by
their father and natural guardian
Mr.K.Lakshmanan Reddy
7.Mr.Narasimhan
8.Mrs.Sarojini .. Respondents
1/4
S.A.No.453 of 2010
Prayer: Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the decree and judgment dated 23.12.2008 made in A.S.No.512 of 2007 and Cross Appeal No.676 of 2007 on the file of the III Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai by reversing the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2006 passed in O.S.No.7591 of 1997 on the file of the learned XVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.G.Suriya Narayanan for Mr.S.D.Balaji ------- J U D G M E N T (The case has been heard through video conference) There is no representation for the appellant. The learned counsel
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Devarajulu
- respondent
Sanjeevi
- respondent
Rukmani
- respondent
Vasanthakumar
- respondent
K. Lakshmanan Reddy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court