Allowed

M.Karthiselvam v. the Chairman/Sub Committee

Madras HC28 Feb 2020REV.APPL/32/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Review Application was allowed. The court recalled the judgment of 13.1.2020 that was passed without considering a subsequent Full Bench decision. The writ appeal was disposed of on the terms of the Full Bench judgment, and the Single Judge's judgment was modified. The respondent State was directed to assess the appellant's candidature accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The judgment dated 13.1.2020 is recalled. The writ appeal is disposed of on the terms of the Full Bench in W.A.No.8 of 2020. The impugned judgment is modified.

M.Karthiselvam Vs the Chairman/Sub Committee — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Review Application No.32 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 28.02.2020

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.A.P.SAHI, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶8

Review Application No.32 of 2020 M.Karthiselvam .. Applicant Vs The Chairman/Sub Committee Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board Old Commissioner of Police Campus Pantheon Road, Egmore Chennai – 600 008. .. Respondent

¶9

PRAYER: Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure to review the order dated 13.1.2020 passed in W.A.No.58 of 2020.

¶10

For Applicant : Mr.M.G.Ramachandran For Respondent : Mr.V.Kadhirvelu Spl. Government Pleader

¶11

___________ Page 1 of 4_

¶12

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶13

Review Application No.32 of 2020

¶14

JUDGMENT

¶15

(Delivered by The Hon'ble Chief Justice )

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the State.

¶17

The applicant has come up contending that the judgment

¶18

dated 13.1.2020 deserves to be recalled keeping in view the pronouncement of the Full Bench of this Court arising out of the same issue vide judgment dated 29.1.2020 in W.A.No.8 of 2020 and batch cases [ A.Parthiban and others v. Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board and others ].

¶19

We have considered the submissions raised and we find that

¶20

the justification for moving this review application is clearly made out

¶21

both in law as well as in fact, in as much as the view taken by the Full

¶22

Bench clearly applies on the facts of the case, which does not appear to have been considered by us while delivering the judgment dated 13.1.2020.

¶23

Page 2 of 4

¶24

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶25

Review Application No.32 of 2020

¶26

The review application is allowed and the judgment dated 13.1.2020 is recalled. The writ appeal stands disposed of on the same terms as the judgment of the Full Bench dated 29.1.2020. The impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge stands modified accordingly. The respondent State may proceed to assess the candidature of the appellant accordingly. No costs.

¶27

(A.P.S., CJ.) (S.P., J.) 28.2.2020 Index : No sasi To: The Chairman/Sub Committee Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board Old Commissioner of Police Campus Pantheon Road, Egmore Chennai – 600 008.

¶28

___________ Page 3 of 4_

¶29

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶30

Review Application No.32 of 2020

¶31

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD,J.

¶32

(sasi)

¶33

Review Application No.32 of 2020

¶34

28.02.2020

¶35

___________ Page 4 of 4_

¶36

http://www.judis.nic.in

M.Karthiselvam v. the Chairman/Sub Committee

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Karthiselvam v. the Chairman/Sub Committee

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuthalam P.Kalyanam Vs Union of India

Narasimmabalan Vs Union of India

The Union of India Vs M.Asiya Begum -(Si/Exe)

Chemplast Sanmar Vs the Presiding Officer

M/S Cotton Tex, Vs Income Tax Settlement

Mohandoss Vs The Disciplinary Authority for