Disposed

G.Mohammed Farhan v. Gousiya Farhan

Madras HC21 Jan 2020OP/745/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment concerns the disposal of Original Petitions for minor custody filed under the Guardian and Wards Act. The court examined the parties' Memorandum of Compromise, noting the petitioner agreed to give up rights to the child. Ruling that there was no impediment, the court disposed of the petition as per the compromise and closed connected miscellaneous applications.

What did the court decide?

Original Petition No.745 of 2019 and connected miscellaneous applications disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 20.01.2020.

G.Mohammed Farhan Vs Gousiya Farhan — Child Custody and Guardianship | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

O.P.No.745 of 2019 & O.A.No.868 of 2019 & A.No.7461 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 21.01.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶6

O.P.No.745 of 2019 &
O.A.No.868 of 2019 & A.No.7461 of 2019
G.Mohamed Farhan .. Petitioner
Vs
Gousiya Farhan .. Respondent

¶7

Original Petition filed under Sections 3, 7 to 10 and Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act read with Order XXI Rule 2 and 3 of the Original Side Rules praying to grant permanent custody of the minor boy child, namely Sheikh Zohaan Kabir, born on 05.12.2018, currently aged about 4.5 months; the petitioner be appointed as the guardian of the person of the minor boy child, namely Sheikh Zohaan Kabir, born on 05.12.2018, currently aged about 4.5 months and render justice.

¶8

For Petitioner : M/s.Geeta Ramaseshan

¶9

For Respondent : Mr.S.Sivaraman

¶10

1/4

¶11

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶12

O.P.No.745 of 2019 & O.A.No.868 of 2019 & A.No.7461 of 2019

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

The learned counsel for both parties submit that the parties

¶15

entered into a Memorandum of Compromise dated 20.01.2020 and request that the Original Petition may be disposed of in accordance

¶16

with the said Memorandum of Compromise.

¶17

I considered the submissions of the learned counsel and examined the Memorandum of Compromise.

¶18

From the said document, it is evident that both the parties and their respective counsel have signed in the Memorandum of

¶19

Compromise. The petitioner is present before this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has given up

¶20

rights over the minor child who will be taken care of by the mother.

¶21

The parties have expressly agreed as follows in paragraph-

¶22

10 of the Memorandum of Compromise:

¶23

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶24

2/4

¶25

O.P.No.745 of 2019 & O.A.No.868 of 2019 & A.No.7461 of 2019

¶26

“10. The party to the first part has

¶27

filed OS.No.194 of 2019 seeking dissolution of

¶28

their marriage under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 and also a petition for maintenance being M.C.No.450 of 2019 under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The party to the second part has filed OS No.187 of 2018 for restitution of conjugal rights. The said cases are pending before the Hon'ble Vth Additional Family Court, Chennai. The Hon'ble Vth Additional Family Court may dispose of the said cases by way of a decree recording this memorandum of compromise.”

¶29

It is also submitted that the said cases were disposed of on 20.01.2020 in accordance with the said Memorandum of Compromise.

¶30

3/4

¶31

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶32

O.P.No.745 of 2019 & O.A.No.868 of 2019 & A.No.7461 of 2019

¶33

kal

¶34

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J

¶35

Therefore, I find that there is no impediment for disposal of this original petition in terms of the said Memorandum of Compromise dated 20.01.2020. Accordingly, the Original Petition No.745 of 2019 is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 20.01.2020 which shall form an integral part of the order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications are closed. 21.01.2020 kal O.P.No.745 of 2019 & O.A.No.868 of 2019 & A.No.7461 of 2019

¶36

4/4

¶37

http://www.judis.nic.in

G.Mohammed Farhan v. Gousiya Farhan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Mohammed Farhan v. Gousiya Farhan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.N.S.Balachandhar and Another Vs the Honorary Secretary and 11 Others

Rajmal Jain Vs No Respondent

T.S. Narayanan Vs Revathy M and 2 Others

T.Rajendran Vs D.K.Janakiraman (Died)

The Indian Officers Asso. Vs M/S.Swaruba Engineering

Bharat Heavy Electricals Vs M/S.Ub Engineering Limited