Anbazhagan v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
Habeas Corpus petition filed to produce Boopalan and set him at liberty. Subsequently, the detention was described as withdrawn by the complainant, resulting in the closure of the petition without a substantive order disposing of the habeas corpus application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.10.2020
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH
and
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice D. KRISHNAKUMAR
H.C.P. No. 240 of 2020
Anbazhagan ... Petitioner/ Uncle of Victim Man vs State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Hosur Police Station, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondent
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondent to produce the person or body of the petitioner's uncle's son, namely, Boopalan, Hindu, aged about 27 years, before this Court and set him at liberty.
For Petitioner .. Mr.C.Vinodhkumar For Respondent .. Mr.R.Prathap Kumar, Addl.Public Prosecutor
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.]
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anbazhagan
- respondent
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Hosur Police Station, Hosur, Krishnagiri District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court