Andal v. R.Kamalam
Case brief
What is this about?
In this civil revision petition under Article 227, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the learned District Munsif to dispose of a pending interim injunction application within one month, noting the three-year delay was unjustifiable.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the learned District Munsif, Kulithalai, to dispose of I.A.No. 577 of 2017 within one month from receipt of the order.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD).No.814 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 06.11.2020 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. GOVINDARAJ
C.R.P(MD).No.814 of 2020
- Andal
- Janarthanan
3.Madhanagopal ... Petitioners /Respondents/ Defendants
Vs.
P. Kamalam ... Respondent/Petitioner / Plaintiff
Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the District Munsif, Kulithalai to dispose of the I.A.No. 577 of 2017 in O.S.No.131 of 2017, within the time frame fixed by this Court.
For Petitioners : Mr. K. Arunraj
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the learned District Munsif was directed to dispose of the pending injunction application within the fixed time frame.
What is the justifiable period for disposing of an injunction application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Andal
- petitioner
Janarthanan
- petitioner
Madhanagopal
- respondent
P. Kamalam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court