Mr.M.Venkatasamy Naicker v. K.Gurusamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petitions were dismissed as infructuous since the underlying suit was dismissed as withdrawn in 2013, rendering the impugned orders no longer relevant.
Civil Revision Petitions were dismissed as infructuous since the underlying suit was dismissed as withdrawn in 2013, rendering the impugned orders no longer relevant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD)(MD).Nos.2341 of 2011 and 741 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 10.03.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR
C.R.P.(PD)(MD).Nos.2341 of 2011 and 741 of 2012 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2011
M.Venkatasamy Naicker .. Petitioner in both petitions
Vs.
6.Hindu Primary School, Sattikinathupatti, The Educational Institution, belonged to, S.Thiruvenkidapuram Kammavar community, Thiruvenkidapuram,
a Registered Society, through its Secretary, K.Gurusamy. .. Respondents in both petitions
Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the fair and final orders, dated 06.08.2011 in I.A.No.1913 of 2010 in I.A.No.712 of 2010 in O.S.No.598 of 2005 and dated 20.09.2010 in I.A.No.712 of 2010 in O.S.No.598 of 2005 respectively on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Srivilliputhur.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sivaji For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan for R6
R1 – R5 No Appearance
ORDER
The learned counsels appearing on either side reported that the Civil Revision Petitions arises out of the orders passed in the interlocutory applications passed pending suit in O.S.No.598 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Srivilliputhur. The learned counsels also stated that the suit itself was dismissed as withdrawn in the year 2013. Hence, it is represented that the Civil Revision Petitions may be dismissed as infructuous
1/2
C.R.P.(PD)(MD).Nos.2341 of 2011 and 741 of 2012
and the learned counsel for the petitioner also produced before this Court the case status report generated from e-court webside.
2.Recording the statements made by both counsel, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Assistant Registrar (AD-II)
// True Copy //
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
TM
To
The Additional District Munsif, Srivilliputhur.
Copy to
The Section Officer,( 2 copies) E.R/V.R.Section,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
C.R.P.(PD)(MD).Nos.2341 of 2011 and 741 of 2012 10.03.2020
VB(20.03.2020) 2P 4C
2/2
M. Venkatasamy Naicker
K. Gurusamy
Hindu Primary School, Sattikinathupatti
S.S. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court