Rengaraj v. Veeran
Case brief
What is this about?
This civil revision petition under Article 226 was listed for dismissal as no representation filed by the defaulting petitioner. The Court dismissed it for default and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.1311 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11.03.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.1311 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012
Rengaraj : Petitioner/5th Defendant
.. Vs .. 1.Veeran 2.Krishnan : Respondents/Plaintiffs
3.Tamil Nadu Government rep. by The District Collector, District Collectorate, Tiruchirappalli.
4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Thuraiyur Post & Taluk, Trichy District.
5.The Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Thuraiyur Post & Taluk, Trichy District. : Respondents/Defendants 1 to 3 6.Nallusamy : Respondent/Defendant No.4
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records pertaining to the impugned decree, dated 16.02.2012 passed in O.S.No.80 of 2011 on the file of District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur and set aside the same as illegal and directing the learned District Munsif, Thuraiyur to reopen the above suit.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition should be dismissed for default without the petitioner appearing?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rengaraj
- respondent
Veeran
- respondent
Krishnan
- respondent
Government of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur Post & Taluk
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court