Disposed

Sankaravinayagar v. Arumugapandian

Madras HC22 Dec 2020CRP(MD)/1092/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Senior citizens filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking expedited disposal of a pending execution petition. The Court, without examining merits, directed the District Munsif to dispose of the matter within three months. The petition was admitted and disposed of with this direction.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the District Munsif to dispose of E.P.No.19 of 2019 in O.S.No.567 of 2009 within three months.

Sankaravinayagar Vs Arumugapandian — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

C.R.P(MD).No.1092 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 22.12.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. GOVINDARAJ

¶6

C.R.P(MD).No.1092 of 2020

¶7

Sankara Vinayagar

¶8

Sundararaj

¶9

... Petitioners

¶10

rep. by Rajapalayam Taluk

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.Arumugapandian 2.Kattai Palanisamy @ A. Palanisamy

¶13

3.Gurusamy Naicker 4.Muniyandi Pillai. ... Respondents

¶14

Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to expedite the trial in E.P.No.19 of 2019 in O.S.No.567 of 2009 on the file of the learned District Munsif Court, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

¶15

For Petitioner ... Mr.S. Muniyandi

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed for issuing a direction to the learned District Munsif, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District, to dispose of the E.P.No.19 of 2019 in O.S.No.567 of 2009, within the stipulated period of time.

¶18

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Since the case is for a limited relief of early disposal, no notice need be sent to the respondents.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the revision petitioners / plaintiffs are Senior Citizens, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the learned District Munsif, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District, to dispose of the E.P.No.19 of 2019 in O.S.No.567 of 2009, pending on his file, as expeditiously as possible, in any event, not later than, three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

1/2

¶22

C.R.P(MD).No.1092 of 2020

¶23

With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶24

Assistant Registrar (P&A)

¶25

// True Copy //

¶26

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶27

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶28

¶29

The District Munsif, Rajapalayam.

¶30

C.R.P(MD).No.1092 of 2020 22.12.2020

¶31

VB (18.01.2021) 2P 2C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

Sankaravinayagar v. Arumugapandian

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sankaravinayagar v. Arumugapandian

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Rathinasabapathy(Died) Vs the Special Tahsildar

The Revenue Divisional Officer Vs M.S.A. Ibrahim (Died)

A.Rathinasabapathy(Died) Vs the Special Tahsildar

Karpagavalli (Died) Vs Kalichamy

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs K. Murugan

Jayavel Murugan Vs Vairakkannu Ammal