High Court dismissed Civil Revision challenging District Munsif''s order allowing plaintiff to summon P.W.4 post-closing of evidence. Court found no prejudice to defendant and directed disposal of suit within three months.
Civil revision petition dismissed; im̄peached order confirmed; suit directed to be disposed within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.01.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
C.R.P.No.63 of 2020 and C.M.P.No.358 of 2020
L.Muthusamy .. Petitioner/2nd Respondent/2nd Defendant
Vs.
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 25.11.2019, made in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.S.No.66 of 2008 on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondents : Mr.V.S.Kesavan
O R D E R
Revision has been filed against the order permitting the first respondent / plaintiff, to examine one Mr.Palanisamy as P.W.4.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kk
To
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai.
+1cc to Mr.N.Manokaran, Advocate SR.No.2902
+1cc to Mr.V.S.Kesavan, Advocate SR.No.2544
C.R.P.No.63 of 2020 and C.M.P.No.358 of 2020
RLD(CO) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ GMY(14/07/2020)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permitting a plaintiff to examine an additional witness after filing no-more endorsement causes prejudice to the defendant.
L.Muthusamy
M.K.Chinnappan
P.Santhi
Baranithar
V.BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
