Senthilkumar v. Kannappan
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a civil revision petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution after finding the petitioner had failed to appear for hearing.
What did the court decide?
Civil revision petition C.R.P.(PD). No.470 of 2018 was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 19.06.2018
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
C.R.P.(PD). No.470 of 2018
Senthilkumar ... Petitioner
Vs.
Kannappan ... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.220 of 2017 in O.S.No.161 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Court, Cuddalore.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.V.Balamurugan
O R D E R
When the civil revision petition was taken up for hearing on 15.02.2018, notice was ordered to be served, returnable in six weeks and hence the matter was directed to be listed after six weeks.
2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Senthilkumar
- respondent
Kannappan
Coram
P. Velmurugan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court