Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Muthusamy Vs Pushparaj — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2020)

Home
Madras HC
2020
Muthusamy Vs PushparajMuthusamy v. Pushparaj

Dismissed

Muthusamy v. Pushparaj

Madras HC21 Dec 2020CRP/456/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge order dismissing a Civil Revision Petition regarding a property dispute as infructuous because the respondent vacated the premises.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

CRP (PD) No.456 of 2018 and CMP No.2411 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

CRP (PD) No.456 of 2018 and
CMP No.2411 of 2018
Muthusamy ... Petitioner
Vs
Pushparaj ... Respondent

Prayer: The Civil Revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair & decreetal order of the II Additional District Munsif Court at Bhavani, dated 07.11.2017 in I.A.No.143 of 2017 in O.S No 252 of 2014.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Valliappan For Respondent : Mr.S.Lakshmanasamy

1/3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CRP (PD) No.456 of 2018 and CMP No.2411 of 2018

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Muthusamy
respondent
Pushparaj

Coram

AI extract

R.Subramanian

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 21 Dec 2020 · December
Registered: 5 Feb 2018
Case no.: CRP/456/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R. Subramanian

V.Dhachayani Vs G.Padma
18 Dec 2020
Alamelu Vs Arimuthu
18 Dec 2020
Varadarajan Vs Shanmugasundaram
18 Dec 2020
M Andi Vs T Chandra
21 Dec 2020
R.Sudharsan Vs S.Mageshwaran

Cite this judgement

Muthusamy v. Pushparaj, CRP/456/2018 (MAD), decided on 21 December 2020.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

R.Subramanian

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The revisional petition is dismissed as infructuous. The Court observed that the respondent had vacated the premises and handed over possession, thus leaving nothing to survive in the revision filed under Article 226.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

O R D E R

Mr.P.Valliappan, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit

that the respondent who sought for an injunction restraining the petitioner from evicting him except under due process of law, had vacated the premises and handed over possession. Hence, nothing survives in this revision. 2. In view of the above, this Civil Revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 21.12.2020 vum Index: Yes/No Speaking order / Non speaking order To: The II Additional District Munsif, Bhavani.

2/3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CRP (PD) No.456 of 2018 and CMP No.2411 of 2018

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

vum

CRP (PD) No.456 of 2018 and
CMP No.2411 of 2018

21.12.2020

3/3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CNR

HCMA010738112018

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

21 Dec 2020

P.Rajamani Vs Arul.Thiru Treasurer

21 Dec 2020